Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32565803›Full record

ArticleJournal of oncology2020

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy as a Salvage Therapy after Incomplete Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Yizhen Fu, Mian Xi, Yangxun Pan, Jinbin Chen, Juncheng Wang, Shiliang Liu, Li Xu, Zhongguo Zhou, Mengzhong Liu, Minshan Chen and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yizhen FuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1919-7176
Mian XiSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Yangxun PanSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Jinbin ChenSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Juncheng WangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Shiliang LiuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Li XuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Zhongguo ZhouSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1929-4278
Mengzhong LiuSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Minshan ChenSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Lei ZhaoSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.
Yaojun ZhangSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9752-4729
Sun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Residual tumor tissue after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is inevitable in clinical practice, and the optimal management of residual tumor after RFA has not been established. To evaluate the efficiency and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a salvage therapy after incomplete RFA for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), we retrospectively included 32 HCC patients with an initial incomplete response (iIR) to RFA from May 2011 to August 2018. An iIR was defined as the presence of residual enhancement on CT or MRI one month after RFA treatment. The primary endpoint was local tumor control (LTC); the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. All patients fulfilled 6 fractions of SBRT as planned, with dosages ranging from 30 Gy to 54 Gy. The objective response rate (ORR) was 50.0%. The 1- and 2-year LTC rates were 86.6% (95% CI, 74.3% to 98.9%) and 74.7% (95% CI, 55.9% to 93.5%), respectively. Fewer times of prior treatments was associated with better LTC (HR = 11.7,

Identifiers

PMID32565803
PMCPMC7275213
OpenAlexW3030582507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.