Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32565651›Full record

ArticleUrology annals

Forgotten double-J stent: Experience of a tertiary care center.

Vinayak Vajpeyi, Saurabh Chipde, Faiz Ahmed Khan, Sanjay Parashar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urology annals. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vinayak VajpeyiDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplant, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and Post Graduate Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Saurabh ChipdeDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplant, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and Post Graduate Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Faiz Ahmed KhanDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplant, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and Post Graduate Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sanjay ParasharDepartment of Urology and Renal Transplant, Sri Aurobindo Medical College and Post Graduate Institute, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe share our experience of managing 15 cases of forgotten double-J (DJ) stent in our tertiary care center.

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of cases with forgotten DJ stent for a period of 2 years spanning from January 2017 to January 2019. The details included sex, age, literacy, socioeconomic status, stenting indication, duration of indwelling stent, presenting complaints, type of encrustations, various treatments given, intraoperative complications, and their management and eventual outcome.

resultsThe male-to-female ratio was 2:1, and the mean age was 39.5 years (17-65). The mean indwelling time was 31.7 months. The majority of patients had an education score of 1 out of 7 and belonged to lower socioeconomic class according to the modified Kuppuswamy scale. The most common presentation was irritative voiding symptom. The complicated and heavily encrusted stents were managed by combination of endourological procedures, and procedures were staged whenever deemed necessary. Majority of the stents were removed with simple retrograde cystoscopic removal. There was no mortality in our study.

conclusionsA forgotten DJ stent affects population having low education score and belonging to the lower end of the socioeconomic class. Endourological procedures are quite successful in managing a forgotten DJ stent, provided the treatment options are selected judiciously and meticulously. We also suggest some protocols to be followed in our study in order to prevent a forgotten DJ stent.

Indexed as

Double Jpercutaneous nephrolithotomyureteroscopic removal of stone

Identifiers

PMID32565651
PMCPMC7292427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.