ArticleComputers & education2020
Evaluation of e-learning for medical education in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.
Article in Computers & education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
90 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness of E-Learning in Undergraduate ENT Education: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.The Laryngoscope · 2026Pooled it
- Blended learning in medical education in India-a literature-based analysis and description.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Role-Playing-Based Physician Training and Metabolic Outcomes Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Digital Training for Lay Health Care Workers' Knowledge and Skills in HIV Index Case Testing: Cluster Randomized Trial.JMIR medical education · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Feasibility and acceptability of e-learning training about diabetes and insulin usage to Peruvian healthcare professionals.BMJ open quality · 2026Article
- Introducing virtual microscopy at the University of Ghana during the COVID-19 pandemic-Identifying and overcoming obstacles in a low-resource learning environment.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
- Ears for examinations: a multicentre quasi-experimental evaluation of AI-generated revision podcasts on learning outcomes and retention among medical students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Online Outcomes of a Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Course for Multidisciplinary Healthcare Professionals in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Digital Training for Community Health Workers in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2026Article
- E-learning utilization and associated factors among obstetrics and gynecology residents and consultants in Ethiopian teaching hospitals.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- SomaVR: A low-cost virtual reality platform and implementation framework for medical education in resource-limited settings.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Digitalisation of medicine in LMICs (sub-Saharan Africa): enablers, barriers, and funding strategies for sustainable health systems.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Bridging immunization and oral health: a role for paediatric dentists in mitigating vaccine hesitancy in Africa.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Unpacking medical students' resit experiences: a qualitative study of early years medical students´ experiences of a peer-assisted learning programme during summer resit exams.Medical education online · 2025Article
- Barriers and Enablers to the Production of Open Access Medical Education Platforms: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Delphi study on evidence-based CKD prevention strategies for nurses in resource-limited settings: focus on e-learning implementation.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Health Care Professionals' Knowledge, Attitude, Practice, and Infrastructure Accessibility for e-Learning in Ethiopia: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
- Changing Climate, ChangingJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Implementation Outcomes of Reusable Learning Objects in Health Care Education Across Three Malaysian Universities: Evaluation Using the RE-AIM Framework.JMIR medical education · 2025Article
30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), e-learning for medical education may alleviate the burden of severe health worker shortages and deliver affordable access to high quality medical education. However, diverse challenges in infrastructure and adoption are encountered when implementing e-learning within medical education in particular. Understanding what constitutes successful e-learning is an important first step for determining its effectiveness. The objective of this study was to systematically review e-learning interventions for medical education in LMICs, focusing on their evaluation and assessment methods. Nine databases were searched for publications from January 2007 to June 2017. We included 52 studies with a total of 12,294 participants. Most e-learning interventions were pilot studies (73%), which mainly employed summative assessments of study participants (83%) and evaluated the e-learning intervention with questionnaires (45%). Study designs, evaluation and assessment methods showed considerable variation, as did the study quality, evaluation periods, outcome and effectiveness measures. Included studies mainly utilized subjective measures and custom-built evaluation frameworks, which resulted in both low comparability and poor validity. The majority of studies self-concluded that they had had an effective e-learning intervention, thus indicating potential benefits of e-learning for LMICs. However, MERSQI and NOS ratings revealed the low quality of the studies' evidence for comparability, evaluation instrument validity, study outcomes and participant blinding. Many e-learning interventions were small-scale and conducted as short-termed pilots. More rigorous evaluation methods for e-learning implementations in LMICs are needed to understand the strengths and shortcomings of e-learning for medical education in low-resource contexts. Valid and reliable evaluations are the foundation to guide and improve e-learning interventions, increase their sustainability, alleviate shortages in health care workers and improve the quality of medical care in LMICs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.