ArticleBMJ open2020
Early Pandemic Evaluation and Enhanced Surveillance of COVID-19 (EAVE II): protocol for an observational study using linked Scottish national data.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Uptake of COVID-19 vaccinations amongst 3,433,483 children and young people: meta-analysis of UK prospective cohorts.Nature communications · 2024Pooled it
- Tocilizumab versus sarilumab among adults hospitalised with COVID-19: target trial emulation across England and Scotland.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Active surveillance for the safety and effectiveness of health products for COVID-19: a scoping review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Ideometrics: a scientific approach to generating, evaluating, and prioritising ideas.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Investigating the contribution of socio-economic position to ethnic inequalities in severe COVID-19 outcomes: population-based mediation analyses of national linked Scottish data.European journal of public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Are ethnic inequalities in COVID-19 outcomes mediated by occupation risk? Analyses of a 2-year record linked national cohort study in Scotland.European journal of public health · 2025Article
- Using routine primary care data in research: (in)efficient case studies and perspectives from the Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research.BMJ health & care informatics · 2025Article
- Risk of winter hospitalisation and death from acute respiratory infections in Scotland: national retrospective cohort study.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2024Article
- Real-world severe COVID-19 outcomes associated with use of antivirals and neutralising monoclonal antibodies in Scotland.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2024Article
- Quality of ethnicity data within Scottish health records and implications of misclassification for ethnic inequalities in severe COVID-19: a national linked data study.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Caveats in reporting of national vaccine uptake.Journal of global health · 2024Article
- Building sustainable health data capability in Aotearoa New Zealand: opportunities and challenges highlighted through COVID-19.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2024Article
- Article
- Assessing the importance of demographic risk factors across two waves of SARS-CoV-2 using fine-scale case data.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Ethnic inequalities in positive SARS-CoV-2 tests, infection prognosis, COVID-19 hospitalisations and deaths: analysis of 2 years of a record linked national cohort study in Scotland.Journal of epidemiology and community health · 2023Article
- UK research data resources based on primary care electronic health records: review and summary for potential users.BJGP open · 2023Article
- Accelerated waning of the humoral response to COVID-19 vaccines in obesity.Nature medicine · 2023Article
- Severity of BA.2 variant and vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease in Scotland.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionFollowing the emergence of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in December 2019 and the ensuing COVID-19 pandemic, population-level surveillance and rapid assessment of the effectiveness of existing or new therapeutic or preventive interventions are required to ensure that interventions are targeted to those at highest risk of serious illness or death from COVID-19. We aim to repurpose and expand an existing pandemic reporting platform to determine the attack rate of SARS-CoV-2, the uptake and effectiveness of any new pandemic vaccine (once available) and any protective effect conferred by existing or new antimicrobial drugs and other therapies. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A prospective observational cohort will be used to monitor daily/weekly the progress of the COVID-19 epidemic and to evaluate the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions in approximately 5.4 million individuals registered in general practices across Scotland. A national linked dataset of patient-level primary care data, out-of-hours, hospitalisation, mortality and laboratory data will be assembled. The primary outcomes will measure association between: (A) laboratory confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, morbidity and mortality, and demographic, socioeconomic and clinical population characteristics; and (B) healthcare burden of COVID-19 and demographic, socioeconomic and clinical population characteristics. The secondary outcomes will estimate: (A) the uptake (for vaccines only); (B) effectiveness; and (C) safety of new or existing therapies, vaccines and antimicrobials against SARS-CoV-2 infection. The association between population characteristics and primary outcomes will be assessed via multivariate logistic regression models. The effectiveness of therapies, vaccines and antimicrobials will be assessed from time-dependent Cox models or Poisson regression models. Self-controlled study designs will be explored to estimate the risk of therapeutic and prophylactic-related adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: We obtained approval from the National Research Ethics Service Committee, Southeast Scotland 02. The study findings will be presented at international conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.