Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32565480›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Finnish study of intraoperative irrigation versus drain alone after evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma (FINISH): a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Pihla Tommiska, Rahul Raj, Christoph Schwartz, Riku Kivisaari, T Luostarinen, Jarno Satopää, Simo Taimela, Teppo Järvinen, Jonas Ranstam, Janek Frantzen and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04203550 (The Finnish Study of Intraoperative Irrigation Versus Drain Alone After Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04203550 nacompletednot on this map

The Finnish Study of Intraoperative Irrigation Versus Drain Alone After Evacuation of Chronic Subdural Hematoma (FINISH): a Study Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelsinki University Central HospitalRan2020 to 2023Enrolled587ConditionsChronic Subdural HematomaArmsIntraoperative irrigation, No irrigation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Pihla Tommiska *Department of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
Rahul Raj *Department of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland rahul.raj@helsinki.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-4243-9591
Christoph SchwartzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
Riku KivisaariDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
T LuostarinenDivision of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
Jarno SatopääDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.
Simo TaimelaFinland and Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6755-2983
Teppo JärvinenFinland and Finnish Centre for Evidence-Based Orthopedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-3713-956X
Jonas RanstamClinical Sciences, Lunds Universitet, Lund, Sweden.
Janek FrantzenDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Department of Neurosurgery and Turku Brain Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Jussi PostiDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, Department of Neurosurgery and Turku Brain Centre, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Teemu M LuotoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Tampere University Hospital and Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
Ville LeinonenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Pohjois-Savo, Finland.
Sami TetriUnit of Clinical Neuroscience, Neurosurgery, University of Oulu and Medical Research Center, Oulu, Finland.
Timo KoivistoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Kuopio University Hospital and University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Pohjois-Savo, Finland.
Kimmo LönnrotDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Uusimaa, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-4361-1007
University of Helsinki · FIUniversity of Eastern Finland · FIUniversity of Turku · FILund University · SETampere University Hospital · FIUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic subdural haematomas (CSDHs) are one of the most common neurosurgical conditions. The goal of surgery is to alleviate symptoms and minimise the risk of symptomatic recurrences. In the past, reoperation rates as high as 20%-30% were described for CSDH recurrences. However, following the introduction of subdural drainage, reoperation rates dropped to approximately 10%. The standard surgical technique includes burr-hole craniostomy, followed by intraoperative irrigation and placement of subdural drainage. Yet, the role of intraoperative irrigation has not been established. If there is no difference in recurrence rates between intraoperative irrigation and no irrigation, CSDH surgery could be carried out faster and more safely by omitting the step of irrigation. The aim of this multicentre randomised controlled trial is to study whether no intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage results in non-inferior outcome compared with intraoperative irrigation and subdural drainage following burr-hole craniostomy of CSDH. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel group, non-inferiority multicentre trial comparing single burr-hole evacuation of CSDH with intraoperative irrigation and evacuation of CSDH without irrigation. In both groups, a passive subdural drain is used for 48 hours as a standard of treatment. The primary outcome is symptomatic CSDH recurrence requiring reoperation within 6 months. The predefined non-inferiority margin for the primary outcome is 7.5%. To achieve a 2.5% level of significance and 80% power, we will randomise 270 patients per group. Secondary outcomes include modified Rankin Scale, rate of mortality, duration of operation, length of hospital stay, adverse events and change in volume of CSDH. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS/3035/2019 §238) and duly registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. We will disseminate the findings of this study through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04203550.

Indexed as

DrainageRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTherapeutic IrrigationEquivalence Trials as TopicFinlandHematoma, Subdural, ChronicHumansIntraoperative CareMulticenter Studies as TopicProspective StudiesResearch Designchronic subdural haematomairrigation fluidrecurrencesurgical evacuation

Identifiers

PMID32565480
PMCPMC7311024
OpenAlexW3036940881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.