Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32565467›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Getting evidence into clinical practice: protocol for evaluation of the implementation of a home-based cardiac rehabilitation programme for patients with heart failure.

Paulina Daw, Samantha B van Beurden, Colin Greaves, Jet J C S Veldhuijzen van Zanten, Alexander Harrison, Hasnain Dalal, Sinead T J McDonagh, Patrick J Doherty, Rod S Taylor

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paulina DawSchool of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK pxd891@student.bham.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0942-3953
Samantha B van BeurdenPsychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7848-2159
Colin GreavesSchool of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4425-2691
Jet J C S Veldhuijzen van ZantenSchool of Sport, Exercise & Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8422-9512
Alexander HarrisonHealth Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2257-6508
Hasnain DalalCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7316-7544
Sinead T J McDonaghCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0283-3095
Patrick J DohertyHealth Sciences, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1887-0237
Rod S TaylorCollege of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3043-6011
University of Exeter · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-PG-1210-12004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves health-related quality of life and reduces hospital admissions. However, patients with heart failure (HF) often fail to attend centre-based CR programmes. Novel ways of delivering healthcare, such as home-based CR programmes, may improve uptake of CR. Rehabilitation EnAblement in CHronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) is a new, effective and cost-effective home-based CR programme for people with HF. The aim of this prospective mixed-method implementation evaluation study is to assess the implementation of the REACH-HF CR programme in the UK National Health Service (NHS). The specific objectives are to (1) explore NHS staff perceptions of the barriers and facilitators to the implementation of REACH-HF, (2) assess the quality of delivery of the programme in real-life clinical settings, (3) consider the nature of any adaptation(s) made and how they might impact on intervention effectiveness and (4) compare real-world patient outcomes to those seen in a prior clinical trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: REACH-HF will be rolled out in four NHS CR centres across the UK. Three healthcare professionals from each site will be trained to deliver the 12-week programme. In-depth qualitative interviews and focus groups will be conducted with approximately 24 NHS professionals involved in delivering or commissioning the programme. Consultations for 48 patients (12 per site) will be audio recorded and scored using an intervention fidelity checklist. Outcomes routinely recorded in the National Audit of Cardiac Rehabilitation will be analysed and compared with outcomes from a recent randomised controlled trial: the Minnesota Living with HF Questionnaire and exercise capacity (Incremental Shuttle Walk Test). Qualitative research findings will be mapped onto the Normalisation Process Theory framework and presented in the form of a narrative synthesis. Results of the study will inform national roll-out of REACH-HF. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study (IRAS 261723) has received ethics approval from the South Central (Hampshire B) Research Ethics Committee (19/SC/0304). Written informed consent will be obtained from all health professionals and patients participating in the study. The research team will ensure that the study is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Data Protection Act 2018, General Data Protection Regulations and in accordance with the Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care (2005). Findings will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals and presented at local, national and international meetings to publicise and explain the research methods and findings to key audiences to facilitate the further uptake of the REACH-HF intervention.

trial registrationISRCTN86234930.

Indexed as

Cardiac RehabilitationEvaluation Studies as TopicHome Care ServicesExercise ToleranceHeart FailureHumansQuality of LifeResearch DesignUnited Kingdomchange managementheart failurerehabilitation medicine

Identifiers

PMID32565467
PMCPMC7307528
OpenAlexW3036458918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.