Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32564777›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2020

Development of the WHO Antenatal Care Recommendations Adaptation Toolkit: a standardised approach for countries.

Maria Barreix, Theresa A Lawrie, Nancy Kidula, Fatim Tall, Maurice Bucagu, Ram Chahar, Özge Tunçalp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Implementing antenatal care recommendations, South Africa.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria BarreixDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, , World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland. barreixm@who.int.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3613-9672
Theresa A LawrieEvidence-based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5500-8590
Nancy KidulaReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, UHC Life Course Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (WHO-AFRO), Harare, Zimbabwe.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3447-244X
Fatim TallReproductive, Maternal Health and Ageing Team, UHC Life Course Cluster, World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (WHO-AFRO), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3510-6302
Maurice BucaguDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child & Adolescent Health & Ageing, World Health OrganizationCountry Office (WHO-CO), 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7285-0456
Ram ChaharMaternal & Reproductive Health Team, World Health Organization Country Office for India, New Delhi, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7652-4829
Özge TunçalpDepartment of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research, , World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5370-682X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncreasingly, WHO recommendations are defined by context-specific factors and WHO is developing strategies to ensure that recommendations are successfully adapted and implemented at country level. This manuscript describes the development of a toolkit to support governments to adapt the WHO recommendations on antenatal care (ANC) for a positive pregnancy experience for their context in a systematic manner.

methodsThe toolkit was developed in three steps. It was created with input from methodologists and regional implementation experts (Step 1) followed by a user-testing phase (Step 2), implemented during country stakeholder meetings. User testing consisted of stakeholder interviews that were transcribed, and data was categorised according to the content analysis method. Suggestions for toolkit improvement and issues identified during the interviews were assessed as serious, moderately serious or minor/cosmetic.

resultsA total of 22 stakeholders - comprising five Ministry of Health (MoH) consultants, four MoH policy-makers, and 13 advisors/implementers - from Burkina Faso, India, Rwanda and Zambia participated in user-testing interviews during stakeholder meetings held in each country between August 2018 and February 2019. Most stakeholders had a medical or nursing background and half were women. Overall, responses to the toolkit were positive, with all stakeholders finding it useful and desirable. User testing interviews highlighted four serious, four moderately serious and five minor/cosmetic issues to be managed. These were addressed in the final step (Step 3), an updated version of the WHO ANC Recommendations Adaptation Toolkit, comprised of two main components - a baseline assessment tool with spreadsheets for data entry and a Slidedoc

conclusionsThe WHO ANC Recommendations Adaptation Toolkit was developed to support countries to systematically adapt the WHO ANC recommendations for country contexts. Using this approach, similar tools can be developed to support guideline implementation across different health domains and the continuum of care.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesGuidelines as TopicPrenatal CareWorld Health OrganizationFemaleHealth PolicyHumansPolicy MakingPregnancyAntenatal careevidence-basedguidanceimplementationpolicy-makerpolicy-makingstakeholder engagementtoolkituser-testingWHO guidelines

Identifiers

PMID32564777
PMCPMC7310220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.