Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32564390›Full record

Observational studyMedical education2020

Chances for learning intraprofessional collaboration between residents in hospitals.

Natasja Looman, Cornelia Fluit, Marielle van Wijngaarden, Esther de Groot, Patrick Dielissen, Dieneke van Asselt, Jacqueline de Graaf, Nynke Scherpbier-de Haan

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Academic satisfaction in residents of the north zone, Mexico City].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natasja LoomanDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2104-6449
Cornelia FluitDepartment for Research in Learning and Education, Radboudumc Health Academy, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Marielle van WijngaardenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Esther de GrootJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Patrick DielissenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Dieneke van AsseltDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Jacqueline de GraafRadboudumc Health Academy, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Nynke Scherpbier-de HaanDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIntraprofessional collaboration (intraPC) between primary care (PC) doctors and medical specialists (MSs) is becoming increasingly important. Patient safety issues are often related to intraPC. In order to equip doctors well for their task of providing good quality and continuity of care, intraPC needs explicit attention, starting in postgraduate training. Worldwide, PC residents undertake a hospital placement during their postgraduate training, where they work in proximity with MS residents. This placement offers the opportunity to learn intraPC. It is yet unknown whether and how residents learn intraPC and what barriers to and opportunities for exist in learning intraPC during hospital placements.

methodsWe performed an ethnographic non-participatory observational study in three emergency departments and three geriatric departments of five hospitals in the Netherlands. This was followed by 42 in-depth interviews with the observed residents and supervisors. The observations were used to feed the questions for the in-depth interviews. We analysed the interviews iteratively following the data collection using template analysis.

resultsHospital wards are rich in opportunities for learning intraPC. These opportunities, however, are seldom exploited for various reasons: intraPC receives limited attention when formulating placement goals, so purposeful learning of intraPC hardly takes place; residents lack awareness of the learning of intraPC; MS residents are not accustomed to searching for expertise from PC residents; PC residents adapt to the MS role and they contribute very little of their PC knowledge, and power dynamics in the hospital department negatively influence the learning of intraPC. Therefore, improvements in mindset, professional identity and power dynamics are crucial to facilitate and promote intraPC.

conclusionsIntraprofessional collaboration is not learned spontaneously during hospital placements. To benefit from the abundant opportunities to learn intraPC, adjustments to the set-up of these placements are necessary. Learning intraPC is promoted when there is a collaborative culture, hierarchy is limited, and there is dedicated time for intraPC and support from the supervisor.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyPhysiciansAgedHospitalsHumansLearningNetherlands

Identifiers

PMID32564390
PMCPMC7754101
OpenAlexW3036100702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.