Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32564328›Full record

ReviewCNS drugs2020

Methadone for Pain Management: A Pharmacotherapeutic Review.

Denise Kreutzwiser, Qutaiba A Tawfic

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in CNS drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06056245 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Postoperative Pharmacokinetics of Methadone in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

TypeobservationalSponsorPontificia Universidad Catolica de ChileRan2024 to 2024Enrolled20ConditionsChronic Kidney Diseases, Post Operative Pain, Pain, AcuteArmsPreoperative step, Intraoperative, Post-operative
NCT07222072 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Methadone to Reduce Chronic Opioid Use After Major Spine Surgery: The MEND Pilot Feasibility Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2025 to 2028Enrolled120ConditionsPost Operative Pain, Spinal SurgeryArmsMethadone, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Chronic Pain and Opioids in the Elderly: Treating the Brain, Not Just the Body.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. [Clinical pharmacology of opioid analgesics].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Denise KreutzwiserPain Management Program, St. Joseph's Hospital, St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, ON, Canada. denise.kreutzwiser@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-9104
Qutaiba A TawficDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, and St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8566-9891
St. Joseph's Hospital · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methadone is increasingly being used for its analgesic properties. Despite the increasing popularity, many healthcare providers are not familiar with methadone's complex pharmacology and best practices surrounding its use. The purpose of this narrative review article is to discuss the pharmacology of methadone, the evidence surrounding methadone's use in acute pain management and both chronic cancer and non-cancer pain settings, as well as highlight pertinent safety, monitoring, and opioid rotation considerations. Methadone has a unique mechanism of action when compared with all other opioids and for this reason methadone has come to hold a niche role in the management of opioid-induced hyperalgesia and central sensitization. Understanding of the mechanisms of variability in methadone disposition and drug interactions has evolved over the years, with the latest evidence revealing that CYP 2B6 is the major determinant of methadone elimination and plays a key role in methadone-related drug interactions. From an acute pain perspective, most studies evaluating the use of intraoperative intravenous methadone have reported lower pain scores and post-operative opioid requirements. Oral methadone is predominantly used as a second-line opioid treatment for select chronic pain conditions. As a result, several oral morphine to oral methadone conversion ratios have been proposed, as have methods in which to rotate to methadone. From an efficacy standpoint, limited literature exists regarding the effectiveness of methadone in the chronic pain setting with most of the available efficacy data pertaining to methadone's use in the treatment of cancer pain. Many of the prospective studies that exist feature low participant numbers. Few clinical trials investigating the role of methadone as an analgesic treatment are currently underway. The complicated pharmacokinetic properties of methadone and risks of harm associated with this drug highlight how critically important it is that healthcare providers understand these features before prescribing/dispensing methadone. Particular caution is required when converting patients from other opioids to methadone and for this reason only experienced healthcare providers should undertake such a task. Further randomized trials with larger sample sizes are needed to better define the effective and safe use of methadone for pain management.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCancer PainChronic PainHumansMethadonePain ManagementProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidMethadone

Identifiers

PMID32564328
OpenAlexW3036420635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.