Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32564203›Full record

ReviewCurrent obesity reports2020

Is There an Obesity Paradox in Critical Illness? Epidemiologic and Metabolic Considerations.

Irene Karampela, Evangelia Chrysanthopoulou, Gerasimos Socrates Christodoulatos, Maria Dalamaga

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current obesity reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Right ventricular function in pulmonary hypertension and obesity: a cross-sectional cohort study with survival follow-up.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Irene KarampelaSecond Department of Critical Care, Attikon General University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini St, Haidari, 12462, Athens, Greece. eikaras1@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6912-4042
Evangelia ChrysanthopoulouSecond Department of Critical Care, Attikon General University Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1 Rimini St, Haidari, 12462, Athens, Greece.
Gerasimos Socrates ChristodoulatosDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias 75, Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece.
Maria DalamagaDepartment of Biological Chemistry, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Mikras Asias 75, Goudi, 11527, Athens, Greece.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewObesity represents a global epidemic with serious implications in public health due to its increasing prevalence and its known association with a high morbidity and mortality burden. However, a growing number of data support a survival benefit of obesity in critical illness. This review summarizes current evidence regarding the obesity paradox in critical illness, discusses methodological issues and metabolic implications, and presents potential pathophysiologic mechanisms. RECENT

findingsData from meta-analyses and recent studies corroborate the obesity-related survival benefit in critically ill patients as well as in selected populations such as patients with sepsis and acute respiratory distress syndrome, but not trauma. However, this finding warrants a cautious interpretation due to certain methodological limitations of these studies, such as the retrospective design, possible selection bias, the use of BMI as an obesity index, and inadequate adjustment for confounding variables. Main pathophysiologic mechanisms related to obesity that could explain this phenomenon include higher energy reserves, inflammatory preconditioning, anti-inflammatory immune profile, endotoxin neutralization, adrenal steroid synthesis, renin-angiotensin system activation, cardioprotective metabolic effects, and prevention of muscle wasting. The survival benefit of obesity in critical illness is supported from large meta-analyses and recent studies. Due to important methodological limitations, more prospective studies are needed to further elucidate this finding, while future research should focus on the pathophysiologic role of adipose tissue in critical illness.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessEnergy MetabolismHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicObesitySurvivalBody mass indexCritically illMortalityObeseObesity paradoxOverweightSepsisSurvival

Identifiers

PMID32564203
OpenAlexW3036473016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.