Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32564176›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2021

Meniscus transplantation-prospective assessment of clinical results in two, five and ten year follow-up.

Libor Paša, Ján Kužma, Radim Herůfek, Josef Prokeš, Jiří Jarkovský, Vojtěch Havlas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Libor PašaDepartment of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. l.pasa@seznam.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3718-108X
Ján KužmaDepartment of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Radim HerůfekDepartment of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Josef ProkešDepartment of Traumatology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Jiří JarkovskýInstitute of Biostatics and Analysis, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
Vojtěch HavlasDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Masaryk University · CZCharles University · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe authors present clinical results in patients following transplantation of deep-frozen menisci within ten years following the surgery.

methodsA cohort of 46 patients who were transplanted altogether 49 menisci was subject to prospective study following six months, two, five and ten years after meniscus transplantation. For subjective assessment, we used KOOS, IKDC and Lysholm scores; objective assessment was based on load X-ray examination of the operated knee at two, five and ten years after the surgery, MRI examination of 34 patients in the interval of two and ten years after the operation, control arthroscopy was performed in 23 patients eight of whom suffered a new injury.

resultsAll 38 patients who have completed ten year follow-up without any new injury of the operated joint demonstrated statistically significant improvement of mobility in the period of six months and two, five and ten years following the meniscal transplantation. Further follow-up demonstrated different results in patients with a new injury and without a new injury of the operated knee joint. In eight patients (17.3%), the follow-up was disturbed by a new injury of the operated joint within three to eight years after the meniscal transplantation. In three patients with the damaged meniscal transplant, a cartilage deterioration from degree II to degree IIIa was found. In second-look arthroscopy, the patients with no injury showed signs of the improved condition of cartilage by one degree according to ICRS classification on average. The MRI imaging showed relatively frequent (47%) extrusion of the anterior and medial part of meniscus (2.5-3.8 mms) without the followed-up dynamics of changes at two and ten years after the surgery.

conclusionAll patients in the selected cohort proved the positive benefit of meniscus transplant when it comes to the improvement of clinical symptoms and improvement of mobility of the operated knee joint. The higher mobility following the transplantation compared to the activity prior to the surgery could have contributed to a new injury of the operated joint in 17% of the patients in the cohort.

Indexed as

MeniscusTibial Meniscus InjuriesArthroscopyFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingMenisci, TibialProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome10 years follow-upArthroscopyFunctional outcomeMeniscusTransplantation

Identifiers

PMID32564176
OpenAlexW3036138141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.