ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020
Comparison of test results from two separate video head impulse test systems in a cohort of patients diagnosed with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Spectrum of Peripheral-Vestibular Deficits and Their Change Over Time in CANVAS/RFC1-Related Ataxia Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Quantitative Head-Impulse Testing.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Quantitative Oculomotor Assessment in Hereditary Ataxia: Systematic Review and Consensus by the Ataxia Global Initiative Working Group on Digital-motor Biomarkers.Cerebellum (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Assessing vestibular function in patients with vestibular schwannoma: a comprehensive multi-test vestibular evaluation.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Comparing Video Head Impulse Testing in Patients With Acute Vestibular Dysfunction.Otology & neurotology open · 2024Article
- The Effect of Somatosensorial System on Vestibular System.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022Article
- Saccades Matter: Reduced Need for Caloric Testing of Cochlear Implant Candidates by Joint Analysis of v-HIT Gain and Corrective Saccades.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeVideo head impulse testing (vHIT) is a relatively new technology enabling evaluation of vestibular function. The aim of this study was to compare the test results from two separate vHIT systems in a group of patients diagnosed with a unilateral vestibular schwannoma (VS) with regards to sensitivity, specificity and inter-examiner differences.
methodsForty-two patients were examined with two separate vHIT systems: EyeSeeCam
resultsWith the majority of test parameters, the two test systems were in agreement. Vestibular deficits were found in 40.5% (system A) to 45% (system B) of patients with a VS on the tested side; corresponding to a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86.4% (system B) to 94.4% (system A). The specificity was 97.6% for system A and 92.9% for system B. An overall agreement between the two vHIT systems measured as kappa was computed to be 0.61. There were no significant inter-examiner differences. When testing the vertical SCCs, a tendency of too high mean gain values was seen with system A but not with system B.
conclusionIn patients with unilateral VS, vHIT is a test with moderate sensitivity and high specificity in regard to identification of a vestibular deficit. There were no significant differences in test results between the two vHIT systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.