Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32564092›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2020

Employment functioning in people with severe mental illnesses living in urban vs. rural areas in India.

Chitra Khare, Kim T Mueser, Daniel Fulford, Vidyadhar G Watve, Neeraj J Karandikar, Sailee Khare, Dipti N Karandikar, Susan R McGurk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Supported employment as a global mental health intervention.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chitra KhareCollege of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Kim T MueserCenter for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, 940 Commonwealth Ave. West, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. mueser@bu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1482-8314
Daniel FulfordCollege of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Sargent College, Boston University, 635 Commonwealth Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Vidyadhar G WatveDepartment of Psychiatry, Poona Hospital and Research Centre, Sadashiv Peth, Pune, Maharashtra, 411030, India.
Neeraj J KarandikarManasdeep Psychiatric and De-Addiction Center, Dr. Karandikar Hospital, Laltaki, Siddharthnagar, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, 414001, India.
Sailee KhareKEM Hospital and Research Centre (KEMHRC), Sardar Moodliar Road, Rasta Peth, Pune, Maharashtra, 411011, India.
Dipti N KarandikarManasdeep Psychiatric and De-Addiction Center, Dr. Karandikar Hospital, Laltaki, Siddharthnagar, Ahmednagar, Maharashtra, 414001, India.
Susan R McGurkCenter for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Boston University, 940 Commonwealth Ave. West, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Boston University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResearch on employment in people with severe mental illnesses (SMI) in developing countries is sparse and largely limited to employment rates. We conducted a comprehensive study of work, interest in work, and perceived benefits and barriers to work in people with SMI in India.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted with 550 individuals with SMI receiving private psychiatric outpatient services in two districts in western India, one urban (Pune) and the other rural (Ahmednagar).

resultsMore than half of the participants were employed, with significantly more men working (79.4%) than women (35.9%). Higher rates of work were found in rural areas (77.8%), where most work was in family agricultural businesses, than in urban areas (48.9%), where most work was for independent employers. Participants in rural areas worked fewer hours and earned less money, and reported fewer benefits and fewer problems related to work than urban participants. Over 45% of participants working for independent employers found jobs with help from families and extended social networks. Most unemployed participants wanted to work, and desired a variety of supports, including assistance with job finding and illness management.

conclusionsGender-specific social role expectations and families play an important role in work in people with SMI in India. Despite higher rates of work in this sample than most studies from developed countries, a significant subgroup was unemployed but wanted to work. Persons with SMI in developing countries may benefit from the adaptation of validated vocational rehabilitation approaches in developed countries to their cultural context.

Indexed as

EmploymentMental DisordersFemaleHumansIndiaMaleRehabilitation, VocationalUnemploymentDeveloping countriesEmploymentIndiaSchizophreniaSevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID32564092
OpenAlexW3035846787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.