Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32563264›Full record

ArticleBMC neurology2020

Correlation of internal carotid artery diameter and carotid flow with asymmetry of the circle of Willis.

Te-Chang Wu, Tai-Yuan Chen, Ching-Chung Ko, Jeon-Hor Chen, Ching-Po Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neurology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Te-Chang WuDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan. porthoswu@yahoo.com.tw.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4408-4264
Tai-Yuan ChenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9156-4789
Ching-Chung KoDepartment of Medical Imaging, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0721-9606
Jeon-Hor ChenDepartment of Radiology, E-DA Hospital, E-DA Cancer Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4830-927X
Ching-Po LinDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6848-8776
Chi Mei Medical Center · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWUniversity of California, Irvine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to clarify the effect of asymmetric COW variants on carotid flow changes, and proposed an easy estimate of the representative carotid flow volume for accurate numerical simulation.

methodsA total of 210 healthy adults receiving magnetic resonance angiography and carotid duplex sonography were included. Three anterior cerebral artery asymmetry (AA) groups were defined based on the diameter ratio difference (DRD) of bilateral A1 segments: AA1 group, one-side A1 aplasia; AA2, A1 DRD ≥ 50%; AA3, A1 DRD between 10 and 50%. Similarly, 3 posterior communicating artery (PcomA) asymmetry (PA) groups were defined: PA1 group, one fetal-origin posterior cerebral artery and absent contralateral PcomA; PA2, PcomA DRD ≥ 50%; PA3, PcomA DRD between 10 and 50%.

resultsWith A1 asymmetry, the ICA diameter of the dominant A1 is significantly greater than the contralateral side. Significant differences of bilateral ICA flow were present in the AA1 and AA2 groups (mean flow difference 42.9 and 30.7%, respectively). Significant bilateral ICA diameter and flow differences were only found in the PA1 group. Linear regression analysis of ICA diameter and flow found a moderately positive correlation between ICA diameter and flow in all AA groups, with a 1 mm increment in vessel diameter corresponding to a 62.6 ml increment of flow volume. The product of bilateral ICA diameter and flow volume difference (ICA-PDF) could be a potential discriminator with a cutoff of 4.31 to predict A1 asymmetry ≥50% with a sensitivity of 0.81 and specificity of 0.76.

conclusionsThe study verifies that A1 asymmetry causes unequal bilateral carotid inflow, and consequently different bilateral ICA diameters. Adjustment of the inflow boundary conditions according to the COW variants would be necessary to improve the accuracy of numerical simulation.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAdultAgedCarotid Artery, InternalCerebrovascular CirculationCircle of WillisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityCarotid arteryCerebral blood flowCerebral hemodynamicsMR angiographyNeuroanatomyUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID32563264
PMCPMC7305584
OpenAlexW3036631215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.