Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32563242›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2020

Comparing clinical outcomes of piperacillin-tazobactam administration and dosage strategies in critically ill adult patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sarah Fawaz, Stephen Barton, Shereen Nabhani-Gebara

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. ASP-COMPLEX: redefining antimicrobial stewardship to improve outcomes in high-risk patients with severe infections.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Pharmacodynamics of piperacillin/tazobactam againstJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah FawazFaculty of Science, Engineering and computing, Kingston University, Penrhyn Rd, London, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 2EE, UK. s.fawaz@kingston.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6756-5450
Stephen BartonFaculty of Science, Engineering and computing, Kingston University, Penrhyn Rd, London, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 2EE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9661-8416
Shereen Nabhani-GebaraFaculty of Science, Engineering and computing, Kingston University, Penrhyn Rd, London, Kingston upon Thames, KT1 2EE, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5784-4779
Kingston University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, continuous administration of piperacillin-tazobactam has been proposed as a valuable alternative to traditional intermittent administration especially in critically ill patients. However, antibiotic dosing remains a challenge for clinicians as antibiotic dosing regimens are usually determined in non-critically ill hospitalized adult patients. The aim was to conduct a systematic review to identify and highlight studies comparing clinical outcomes of piperacillin tazobactam dosing regimens, continuous/prolonged infusion vs intermittent infusion in critically ill patients. Meta-analyses were performed to assess the overall effect of dosing regimen on clinical efficacy.

methodsStudies were identified systematically through searches of PubMed and Science Direct, in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. Following the systematic literature review, meta-analyses were performed using Review Manager.

resultsTwenty-three studies were included in the analysis involving 3828 critically ill adult participants in total (continuous/prolonged infusion = 2197 and intermittent infusion = 1631) from geographically diverse regions. Continuous/prolonged resulted in significantly: higher clinical cure rates (Odds Ratio 1.56, 95% Confidence Interval 1.28-1.90, P = 0 .0001), lower mortality rates (Odds Ratio 0.68, 95% Confidence Interval 0.55-0.84, P = 0 .0003), higher microbiological success rates (Odds Ratio 1.52, 95% Confidence Interval 1.10-2.11, P = 0.01) and decreasing the length of hospital stay (Mean Difference - 1.27, 95% Confidence Interval - 2.45-0.08, P = 0.04) in critically ill patients.

conclusionResults from this study show that there is a significant level of evidence that clinical outcome in critically ill patients is improved in patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam via continuous/prolonged infusion. However, more rigorous scientific studies in critically ill patients are warranted to reach a sufficient level of evidence and promote further implementation of C/PI as a dosing strategy.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansLength of StayPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationTreatment OutcomeAnti-Bacterial AgentsPiperacillin, Tazobactam Drug CombinationContinuous infusionsCritically ill patientsIntermittent infusion and clinical efficacyProlonged infusion

Identifiers

PMID32563242
PMCPMC7305614
OpenAlexW3035919630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.