ReviewPediatric research2021
Nitric oxide and the brain. Part 2: Effects following neonatal brain injury-friend or foe?
Review in Pediatric research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants with respiratory disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Oxidative Stress and Cerebral Vascular Tone: The Role of Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- The role of zinc in the premature brain: functions, outcomes and future research perspectives.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Review
- Inhaled Nitric Oxide Promotes Angiogenesis in the Rodent Developing Brain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Hypoxia Depresses Synaptic Transmission in the Primary Motor Cortex of the Infant Rat-Role of Adenosine ABiomedicines · 2022Article
- Recent research on the effect of common treatments given in the perinatal period on neurodevelopment in offspring.Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Nitric oxide (NO) has critical roles in a wide variety of key biologic functions and has intricate transport mechanisms for delivery to key distal tissues under normal conditions. However, NO also plays important roles during disease processes, such as hypoxia-ischemia, asphyxia, neuro-inflammation, and retinopathy of prematurity. The effects of exogenous NO on the developing neonatal brain remain controversial. Inhaled NO (iNO) can be neuroprotective or toxic depending on a variety of factors, including cellular redox state, underlying disease processes, duration of treatment, and dose. This review identifies key gaps in knowledge that should prompt further investigation into the possible role of iNO as a therapeutic agent after injury to the brain. IMPACT: NO is a key signal mediator in the neonatal brain with neuroprotective and neurotoxic properties. iNO, a commonly used medication, has significant effects on the neonatal brain. Dosing, duration, and timing of administration of iNO can affect the developing brain. This review article summarizes the roles of NO in association with various disease processes that impact neonates, such as brain hypoxia-ischemia, asphyxia, retinopathy of prematurity, and neuroinflammation. The impact of this review is that it clearly describes gaps in knowledge, and makes the case for further, targeted studies in each of the identified areas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.