Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32563015›Full record

ReviewLung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2020

Radiomics as a personalized medicine tool in lung cancer: Separating the hope from the hype.

Isabella Fornacon-Wood, Corinne Faivre-Finn, James P B O'Connor, Gareth J Price

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Multicentric development and evaluation of [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isabella Fornacon-WoodDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Electronic address: Isabella.fornacon-wood@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk.
Corinne Faivre-FinnDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Radiation Oncology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
James P B O'ConnorDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Department of Radiology, The Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Gareth J PriceDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK C147/A18083Cancer Research UK C147/A25254Cancer Research UK C19221/A22746Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics has become a popular image analysis method in the last few years. Its key hypothesis is that medical images harbor biological, prognostic and predictive information that is not revealed upon visual inspection. In contrast to previous work with a priori defined imaging biomarkers, radiomics instead calculates image features at scale and uses statistical methods to identify those most strongly associated to outcome. This builds on years of research into computer aided diagnosis and pattern recognition. While the potential of radiomics to aid personalized medicine is widely recognized, several technical limitations exist which hinder biomarker translation. Aspects of the radiomic workflow lack repeatability or reproducibility under particular circumstances, which is a key requirement for the translation of imaging biomarkers into clinical practice. One of the most commonly studied uses of radiomics is for personalized medicine applications in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). In this review, we summarize reported methodological limitations in CT based radiomic analyses together with suggested solutions. We then evaluate the current NSCLC radiomics literature to assess the risk associated with accepting the published conclusions with respect to these limitations. We review different complementary scoring systems and initiatives that can be used to critically appraise data from radiomics studies. Wider awareness should improve the quality of ongoing and future radiomics studies and advance their potential as clinically relevant biomarkers for personalized medicine in patients with NSCLC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungLung NeoplasmsDiagnostic ImagingHumansPrecision MedicineReproducibility of ResultsImaging biomarkersLung cancerPersonalized medicineRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID32563015
PMCPMC7383235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.