Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32562806›Full record

Trial reportAppetite2020

Impact of health warning labels on snack selection: An online experimental study.

Natasha Clarke, Emily Pechey, Eleni Mantzari, Anna K M Blackwell, Katie De-Loyde, Richard W Morris, Marcus R Munafò, Theresa M Marteau, Gareth J Hollands

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Appetite, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Evaluating campaign concepts aimed at replacing sugar-sweetened beverages with water.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natasha ClarkeBehaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. Electronic address: ncc42@medschl.cam.ac.uk.
Emily PecheyBehaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Eleni MantzariBehaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Anna K M BlackwellTobacco and Alcohol Research Group, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Katie De-LoydeTobacco and Alcohol Research Group, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Richard W MorrisBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Marcus R MunafòTobacco and Alcohol Research Group, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Theresa M MarteauBehaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Gareth J HollandsBehaviour and Health Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 206853/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive consumption of energy-dense food increases the risk of obesity, which in turn increases the risk of non-communicable diseases, including heart disease, type 2 diabetes and most non-smoking-related cancers. Health warning labels (HWLs) that communicate the adverse health consequences of excess energy consumption could reduce intake of energy-dense foods. The aim of the current study was to estimate the impact on selection of energy-dense snacks of (a) image-and-text HWLs (b) text-only HWLs and (c) calorie information. In a between-subjects, 3 (HWL: image-and-text, text-only, no label) x 2 (calorie information: present, absent), factorial experimental design, participants (N = 4134) were randomised to view a selection of energy-dense and non-energy-dense snacks with one of five label types or no label. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants selecting an energy-dense snack in a hypothetical vending machine task. The proportion of participants selecting an energy-dense snack was reduced in all label groups, relative to the no label group (no label: 59%; calories only: 54%; text-only HWL: 48%; text-only HWL with calories: 44%; image-and-text HWL: 37%; image-and-text HWL with calories: 38%). Compared to the no label group, participants were least likely to select an energy-dense snack in the image-and-text HWL group (OR = 0.46, 95%CI = 0.40, 0.54, p < 0.001). Health warning labels - particularly those including an image and text - have the potential to reduce selection of energy-dense snacks in an online setting. Their impact on selection and consumption in real-world settings awaits testing.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2SnacksEnergy IntakeHumansProduct LabelingChoice architectureEnergy-denseFoodGraphic warningsHealth warning labelsPictorial labelsSnacks

Identifiers

PMID32562806
PMCPMC7450271
OpenAlexW3036733368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.