Observational studyInternational journal of medical education2020
A qualitative study on factors influencing the situational and contextual motivation of medical specialists.
Observational study in International journal of medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outsourced eye care in the Finnish capital region: Switching from fee-for-service to bundled payment model.Acta ophthalmologica · 2026Review
- Self-determination theory in ophthalmology education: factors influencing autonomy, competence and relatedness in medical students.Medical education online · 2023Article
- House officers' specialist career choices and motivators for their choice- a sequential mixed-methods study from Malaysia.BMC medical education · 2022Review
- Development and validation of motivators for medical specialist career choice questionnaire (MMSCCQ) - a methodological study.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- Motivation and personality factors of Generation Z high school students aspiring to study human medicine.BMC medical education · 2022Article
- International trainer perceptions of simulation-based learning: a qualitative study.International journal of medical education · 2021Article
- Do medical specialists cope with stressors through fulfillment of basic psychological needs of self-determination theory.International journal of medical education · 2021Article
- Exploring Factors Associated With the Motivation of Clinical Pharmacists: A Focus on the South African Context.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim was to investigate which factors influence the situational motivation of medical specialists and how situational and contextual motivation affect one another.
methodsA qualitative design was used, and a constructivist approach was adopted with the Self-Determination Theory of motivation as a framework. Twenty-two medical specialists from three medical centers in the Netherlands were recruited through convenience, snowball and purposive sampling and observed for two days each. At the end of the second observation day, a semi-structured interview was conducted. Data were transcribed and coded in an open manner. Themes were finalized through discussion and consensus.
resultsTwo-hundred and fifty hours of observation data together with the interview data identified that medical specialists experience six main themes influencing their situational motivation during a workday. Technical issues are influencing motivation negatively factors. Working with colleagues can be both a motivating factor and influence motivation negatively, e.g., filling in for each other through feelings of relatedness was motivating. Being in control of one's own planning through feelings of autonomy was motivating. Patient care, especially in combination with teaching, stimulated specialists' motivation.
conclusionsThe results indicate that factors influencing motivation negatively are mainly tasks and organizational processes that distract from patient care or that compromise the quality of care. When optimizing the work environment of medical specialists, autonomous motivation and continuing professional development are stimulated. These, in turn, can improve the quality of patient care and wellbeing of specialists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.