Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32562535›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of medical education2020

A qualitative study on factors influencing the situational and contextual motivation of medical specialists.

Stéphanie M E van der Burgt, Klaas Nauta, Gerda Croiset, Rashmi A Kusurkar, Saskia M Peerdeman

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of medical education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Stéphanie M E van der BurgtAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Medicine, Research in Education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Klaas NautaDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Gerda CroisetAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Medicine, Research in Education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rashmi A KusurkarAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculty of Medicine, Research in Education, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Saskia M PeerdemanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim was to investigate which factors influence the situational motivation of medical specialists and how situational and contextual motivation affect one another.

methodsA qualitative design was used, and a constructivist approach was adopted with the Self-Determination Theory of motivation as a framework. Twenty-two medical specialists from three medical centers in the Netherlands were recruited through convenience, snowball and purposive sampling and observed for two days each. At the end of the second observation day, a semi-structured interview was conducted. Data were transcribed and coded in an open manner. Themes were finalized through discussion and consensus.

resultsTwo-hundred and fifty hours of observation data together with the interview data identified that medical specialists experience six main themes influencing their situational motivation during a workday. Technical issues are influencing motivation negatively factors. Working with colleagues can be both a motivating factor and influence motivation negatively, e.g., filling in for each other through feelings of relatedness was motivating. Being in control of one's own planning through feelings of autonomy was motivating. Patient care, especially in combination with teaching, stimulated specialists' motivation.

conclusionsThe results indicate that factors influencing motivation negatively are mainly tasks and organizational processes that distract from patient care or that compromise the quality of care. When optimizing the work environment of medical specialists, autonomous motivation and continuing professional development are stimulated.  These, in turn, can improve the quality of patient care and wellbeing of specialists.

Indexed as

MedicineMotivationPersonal AutonomySocial EnvironmentSpecializationAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelCareer ChoiceEducation, Medical, ContinuingFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandscontinuing professional developmentmedical specialistsmotivationqualitative researchself-determination theory

Identifiers

PMID32562535
PMCPMC7870455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.