Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32562330›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2021

Evaluating optical coherence tomography for surgical margin assessment of canine mammary tumours.

Carolina Fabelo, Laura E Selmic, Pin-Cheh Huang, Jonathan P Samuelson, Jennifer K Reagan, Alexandra Kalamaras, Vincent Wavreille, Guillermo L Monroy, Marina Marjanovic, Stephen A Boppart

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carolina FabeloDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Laura E SelmicDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-6273
Pin-Cheh HuangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Jonathan P SamuelsonDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3593-7202
Jennifer K ReaganDepartment of Surgery, Seattle Veterinary Specialists-Downtown, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Alexandra KalamarasDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Vincent WavreilleDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Guillermo L MonroyDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3669-8514
Marina MarjanovicDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
Stephen A BoppartDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USThe Ohio State University · USOncology Specialists · US

Funding

Intraoperative Polarization-Sensitive OCT for Assessing Breast Tumor MarginsR01CA213149 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BOPPART, STEPHEN A · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation 2204-TNCI NIH HHS R01 CA213149NIH HHS R01CA213149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) uses near-infrared light waves to generate real-time, high-resolution images on the microscopic scale similar to low power histopathology. Previous studies have demonstrated the use of OCT for real-time surgical margin assessment for human breast cancer. The use of OCT for canine mammary tumours (CMT) could allow intra-operative visualisation of residual tumour at the surgical margins. The purpose of this study was to assess OCT imaging for the detection of incomplete tumour resection following CMT surgery. We hypothesized that the OCT images would have comparable features to histopathological images of tissues at the surgical margins of CMT resections along with a high sensitivity of OCT detection of incomplete surgical excision of CMT. Thirty surgical specimens were obtained from nineteen client-owned dogs undergoing surgical resection of CMT. OCT image appearance and characteristics of adipose tissue, skin, mammary tissue and mammary tumour at the surgical margins were distinct and different. The OCT images of normal and abnormal tissues at the surgical margins were utilized to develop a dataset of OCT images for observer evaluation. The sensitivity and specificity for ex vivo images were 83.3% and 82.0% (observer 1) and 70.0% and 67.9% (observer 2). The sensitivity and specificity for in vivo images were 70.0% and 89.3% (observer 1) and 76.7% and 67.9% (observer 2). These results indicate a potential use of OCT for surgical margin assessment for CMT to optimize surgical intervention and clinical outcomes. Improved training and experience of observers may improve sensitivity and specificity.

Indexed as

Dog DiseasesMammary Neoplasms, AnimalMargins of ExcisionTomography, Optical CoherenceAnimalsDogsFemaleSensitivity and Specificityimagingoncologypathologysmall animalsurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID32562330
PMCPMC7749848
OpenAlexW3036309710

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.