Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32562264›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2021

Developing and evaluating risk prediction models with panel current status data.

Stephanie Chan, Xuan Wang, Ina Jazić, Sarah Peskoe, Yingye Zheng, Tianxi Cai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephanie ChanDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Xuan WangDepartment of Statistics, School of Mathematical Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0011-5663
Ina JazićDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sarah PeskoeDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Yingye ZhengPublic Health Sciences Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Tianxi CaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

The Early Detection Research Network: Data Management and Coordinating CenterU24CA086368 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI RUTH D ETZIONI, Ziding Feng · 2010 to 2026
$75.7M
EDRN--DATA MANAGEMENT AND COORDINATING CENTERU01CA086368 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI FENG, ZIDING · 2000 to 2010
$16.9M
Training Grant in Quantitative Sciences for Cancer ResearchT32CA009337 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI QUACKENBUSH, JOHN, TRIPPA, LORENZO · 1986 to 2025
$12.3M
VERITY: Value and Evidence in Rheumatology using bioInformaTics, and advanced analYticsP30AR072577 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Daniel Hal Solomon · 2017 to 2026
$9.8M
Statistical Methods for Optimizing Personalized Treatment SelectionR01HL089778 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI LU TIAN · 2008 to 2026
$4.8M
Statistical Methods for Prospective Evaluation of BiomarkersR01CA236558 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI ZHENG, YINGYE · 2019 to 2024
$1.9M
Semi-supervised Approaches to Denoising Electronic Health Records Data for Risk PredictionR01LM013614 · NLM · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI CAI, TIANXI, GUO, ZIJIAN · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
Semi-supervised Algorithms for Risk Assessment with Noisy EHR DataR21CA242940 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI CAI, TIANXI · 2019 to 2020
$370k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA236558NCI NIH HHS R21 CA242940NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009337NCI NIH HHS U01 CA086368NCI NIH HHS U24 CA086368NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089778NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR072577NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013614
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Panel current status data arise frequently in biomedical studies when the occurrence of a particular clinical condition is only examined at several prescheduled visit times. Existing methods for analyzing current status data have largely focused on regression modeling based on commonly used survival models such as the proportional hazards model and the accelerated failure time model. However, these procedures have the limitations of being difficult to implement and performing sub-optimally in relatively small sample sizes. The performance of these procedures is also unclear under model misspecification. In addition, no methods currently exist to evaluate the prediction performance of estimated risk models with panel current status data. In this paper, we propose a simple estimator under a general class of nonparametric transformation (NPT) models by fitting a logistic regression working model and demonstrate that our proposed estimator is consistent for the NPT model parameter up to a scale multiplier. Furthermore, we propose nonparametric estimators for evaluating the prediction performance of the risk score derived from model fitting, which is valid regardless of the adequacy of the fitted model. Extensive simulation results suggest that our proposed estimators perform well in finite samples and the regression parameter estimators outperform existing estimators under various scenarios. We illustrate the proposed procedures using data from the Framingham Offspring Study.

Indexed as

Proportional Hazards ModelsComputer SimulationLogistic ModelsSample Sizecurrent status datamodel misspecificationrisk predictionrobustnesssingle-index model

Identifiers

PMID32562264
PMCPMC8168594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.