Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32562201›Full record

ArticleMagma (New York, N.Y.)2021

Influence of injection rate in determining the development of artifacts during the acquisition of dynamic arterial phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA MRI studies.

Davide Ippolito, Cesare Maino, Anna Pecorelli, Luca Riva, Giulia Querques, Cammillo Talei Franzesi, Sandro Sironi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Magma (New York, N.Y.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Davide IppolitoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy. davide.atena@tiscalinet.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2696-7047
Cesare MainoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Anna PecorelliDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Luca RivaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Giulia QuerquesDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Cammillo Talei FranzesiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Milano-Bicocca, San Gerardo Hospital, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Sandro SironiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Papa Giovanni XIII Hospital, Piazza OMS 1, 24127, Bergamo, BG, Italy.
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITOspedale Papa Giovanni XXIII · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether different Gd-EOB-DTPA injection rates could influence the development of artifacts during the arterial phase of liver MRI studies. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI studies performed for different clinical indications at a single tertiary referral center were retrospectively evaluated. Each examination was acquired on a 1.5 T scanner with T1 In- and Out-of-Phase, T2 with and without fat-saturation, DWI, and 3D-T1 fat-sat dynamic sequences. Patients were divided into two groups according to the injection rate (1 ml/s and 1.5 ml/s). A single radiologist recorded the presence or absence of artifacts during different acquisition phases, respectively: (1) all examination; (2) only during the arterial phase; (3) only during the portal-venous phase; (4) both in arterial and portal-venous phases. From a total of 748 MRI studies performed, 229 were excluded due to the presence of artifacts during the entire examination. The remaining 519 MRI studies were divided into two groups according to the injection rate.

resultsThe first group (flow rate = 1 ml/s) was composed by 312 (60.1%) patients and the second group (flow rate = 1.5 ml/s) by 207 (39.9%) patients. In the first group, 2 (0.6%) patients showed artifacts in all dynamic sequences; 13 (4%) only in the arterial phase, 16 (5%) only in the portal-venous phase, and 38 (12%) both in arterial and portal-venous phases; a total of 243 (78%) showed no artifacts. In the second group, 3 (1.5%) patients had artifacts in all dynamic sequences, 82 (40%) only in the arterial phase, 20 (10%) only in the portal-venous phase, and 53 (25%) both in arterial and portal-venous phases; a total of 49 (23.5%) showed no artifacts. A significant difference between the two groups regarding the absence of artifacts in all examination and the presence of artifacts only during the arterial phase was found (p < 0.001).

conclusionThe development of artifacts during the arterial phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA liver MRI studies could be related to the injection rate and its reduction may help to decrease the incidence of artifacts.

Indexed as

ArtifactsContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaGadolinium DTPAgadolinium ethoxybenzyl DTPAGadoxetic acid-DTPA (Gd-EOB-DTPA)Injection rateLiverMagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID32562201
OpenAlexW3036900800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.