Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32562153›Full record

Trial reportTechniques in coloproctology2020

"Prophylactic" transanal irrigation (TAI) to prevent symptoms of low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) after rectal resection: results at 12-month follow-up of a controlled randomized multicenter trial.

H R Rosen, C Boedecker, A Fürst, G Krämer, J Hebenstreit, W Kneist

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Techniques in coloproctology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Transanal irrigation in clinical practice: a scoping review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026
    Article
  10. Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Evaluation and Management.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2026
    Review
  11. Effectiveness of transanal irrigation in low anterior resection syndrome.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

H R RosenFaculty of Surgical Oncology, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Freudplatz 3, 1020, Vienna, Austria. rosensurg@csi.com.ORCID 0000-0002-4211-6728
C BoedeckerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
A FürstDepartment of Surgery, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany.
G KrämerDepartment of Surgery, Caritas-Hospital St. Josef, Regensburg, Germany.
J HebenstreitDepartment of Surgery, Hospital St. John of God, Graz, Austria.
W KneistDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Caritas-Krankenhaus St. Josef · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEHospital of the Brothers of St. John of God · ATSigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow anterior resection syndrome (LARS) is associated with a severe negative impact on patients' quality of life (QOL). In a recent prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) by our group, early ("prophylactic") use of transanal irrigation (TAI) following rectal resection for rectal cancer was shown to improve symptoms associated with LARS significantly compared with a group under supportive therapy (ST) within 1 and 3 months following closure of the protective ileostomy. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the outcome after 12 months when patients had the option to choose between the two therapeutic options and/or modify the regimen of TAI (volume and time).

methodsIn the RCT, 18 patients had been allocated to start with TAI following ileostomy closure, while 19 patients remained on ST only. Once the 3-month follow-up had been completed patients could choose between TAI or ST, respectively, and were invited for follow-up after 12 months. The maximum number of bowel movements during the day and the Wexner and LARS score as well as physical (PC) and mental (MC) component of the SF-36 questionnaire were evaluated. Furthermore, in patients who had changed their treatment arm, reasons for this decision were reported.

resultsSix patients were lost to follow-up (all in the ST group). One patient from the ST group started with TAI due to problems associated with LARS, bringing the total number of TAI patients to 19. Nine patients from the previous TAI arm changed to ST due to the long duration of the emptying process (n: 8) or pain during TAI (n: 1), respectively. After 12 months, the median volume of water used for irrigation was 600 ml (range 200-1000 ml). The ten patients who continued with TAI patients showed a lower number of defecation episodes per daytime (TAI median 3; 1-6, ST median 5; 2-10, p: 0.018) and per night (TAI median 0; 0-1, ST median 1; 0-5, p: 0.004) compared to the ST group. Although the LARS score was lower in patients who used TAI after 12 months (TAI median 18; 9-32, ST median 30; 3-39), this failed to reach the level of significance (p: 0.063). Evaluation of the Wexner score and the 36-item Short Form Health Survey as well as comparison of patients who remained on TAI (n: 9) versus those who had stopped TAI after 3 months (n: 9) failed to find any statistically significant difference between TAI and ST.

conclusionsThis follow-up study revealed that a considerable number of patients decided to stop TAI within 12 months. However, the number of bowel movements during the day were still lower when TAI was used than when patients had ST only. CATEGORY: Randomized trial. REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00011752, https://apps.who.int/trialsearch/ .

Indexed as

ProctectomyRectal DiseasesRectal NeoplasmsFollow-Up StudiesHumansIleostomyPostoperative ComplicationsLARSQuality of lifeRectal cancerTransanal irrigation

Identifiers

PMID32562153
OpenAlexW3036948537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.