Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32562138›Full record

ArticleCulture, medicine and psychiatry2021

Authentic Self and Last Resort: International Perceptions of Psychiatric Neurosurgery.

L Y Cabrera, C Courchesne, M Bittlinger, S Müller, R Martinez, E Racine, J Illes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Culture, medicine and psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mapping the Landscape of Equitable Access to Advanced Neurotechnologies in Canada.The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

L Y CabreraCenter for Ethics & Humanities in the Life Sciences, Department of Translational Neuroscience, Michigan State University, East Fee Hall, 965 Wilson Road, Rm C211, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. cabrer22@msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6220-7096
C CourchesneThe University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
M BittlingerDivision of Mind and Brain Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
S MüllerDivision of Mind and Brain Research, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, CCM, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
R MartinezFunctional Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery Unit, Ruber International Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
E RacineInstitut de Recherches Cliniques de Montréal (IRCM), Department of Medicine and Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
J IllesDepartment of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Koerner S124, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada. jilles@mail.ubc.ca.
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEHospital Ruber Internacional · ESMichigan State University · USMontreal Clinical Research Institute · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of British Columbia Hospital · CA

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01GP1621AERA-NET NEURON #ERN-144241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychiatric neurosurgery has resurfaced over the past two decades for the treatment of severe mental health disorders, with improved precision and safety over older interventions alongside the development of novel ones. Little is known, however, about current public opinions, expectations, hopes, and concerns over this evolution in neurotechnology, particularly given the controversial history of psychosurgery. To fill this knowledge gap, we conducted a study with eight focus groups in Vancouver and Montreal (Canada; n = 14), Berlin (Germany; n = 22), and Madrid (Spain; n = 12). Focus group texts were transcribed and analyzed using qualitative content analysis in the language local to each city, guided by the theoretical framework of pragmatic neuroethics. Findings indicate that participants across all cities hold concerns about the last resort nature of psychiatric neurosurgery and the potential impact on the authentic self of patients who undergo these procedures. The views captured serve to advance discussion on the appropriate timing for psychiatric neurosurgery, promote sound health policy for the allocation of this resource, and foster scientific literacy about advances for mental health internationally.

Indexed as

PerceptionAdolescentAdultAgedAnthropology, CulturalCanadaFemaleFocus GroupsGermanyHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedNeurosurgeryPsychosurgeryCultureNeuroethicsPsychiatric neurosurgeryPublic perspectives

Identifiers

PMID32562138
OpenAlexW3036561983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.