Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32562132›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2020

One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass with a Biliopancreatic Limb of 150 cm: Weight Loss, Nutritional Outcomes, Endoscopic Results, and Quality of Life at 8-Year Follow-Up.

Arnaud Liagre, Tarek Debs, Radwan Kassir, Alain Ledit, Gildas Juglard, Mael Chalret du Rieu, Andrea Lazzati, Francesco Martini, Niccolo Petrucciani

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 38 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Arnaud LiagreService de Chirurgie bariatrique, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Clinique des Cedres, Cornebarrieu, France.
Tarek DebsDivision of Digestive Surgery, Archet II Hospital, Nice, France.
Radwan KassirDepartment of Digestive Surgery, CHU Félix Guyon, Saint Denis, La Réunion, France.
Alain LeditService de Gastroenterologie, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Clinique des Cedres, Cornebarrieu, France.
Gildas JuglardService de Chirurgie bariatrique, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Clinique des Cedres, Cornebarrieu, France.
Mael Chalret du RieuService de Chirurgie bariatrique, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Clinique des Cedres, Cornebarrieu, France.
Andrea LazzatiDepartment of General Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Créteil, Créteil, France.
Francesco MartiniService de Chirurgie bariatrique, Ramsay Générale de Santé, Clinique des Cedres, Cornebarrieu, France.
Niccolo PetruccianiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Archet II Hospital, Nice, France. niccolo.petrucciani@uniroma1.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4639-5613
Clinique des Cèdres · FRHôpital l'Archet · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Réunion · FRHôpital Intercommunal de Créteil · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeOne anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is now recognized as a mainstream bariatric procedure, nonetheless concerns about the risk of nutritional deficiencies and biliary reflux persist, and the ideal length of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) is debated. MATERIALS AND

methodsData of patients who underwent OAGB between May 2010 and December 2010 were collected prospectively and analyzed retrospectively. At an 8-year follow-up, a complete evaluation included clinical examination, blood tests, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, and quality of life (QoL) assessed through the BAROS score.

resultsOverall, 115 patients underwent OAGB with a BPL of 150 cm. Thirty-six (31%) were lost at the 8-year follow-up. Mean preoperative weight was 117 ± 20.8 kg and mean BMI 43.2 ± 5.8 kg/m

conclusionOAGB performed with a 150-cm BPL is an effective bariatric procedure, associated with good long-term outcomes in relation to weight loss, QoL, resolution of comorbidities, and a very low rate of protein-calorie malnutrition. Fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies represent the main long-term concern. Endoscopic findings at 8 years are reassuring.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidFollow-Up StudiesHumansQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesWeight LossBariatric surgeryComplicationsLong-term resultsObesityOne anastomosis gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID32562132
OpenAlexW3036583914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.