ArticleClinical rheumatology2021
Article in Clinical rheumatology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcome Measures and Biomarkers for Disease Assessment in Takayasu Arteritis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Article
- Application progress of multiple imaging modalities in Takayasu arteritis.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2021Review
- Vascular Imaging Techniques to Diagnose and Monitor Patients with Takayasu Arteritis: A Review of the Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe present study aimed to evaluate the value of
methodsA retrospective study of 22 TA patients was conducted. All the participants were classified into two groups. Group one including 12 patients, who did not fulfill American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, were diagnosed by modified Ishikawa criteria. Group two involving ten patients, who did not satisfy the modified Ishikawa criteria or ACR criteria, were clinically diagnosed as TA after panel discussion by a combination of clinical data, excluding other diagnoses. PET/CT results were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative metrics. Disease activity was evaluated using the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria.
resultsIn group one, nine patients in active stage and two patients in inactive stage had active FDG uptake. One patient in inactive stage had inactive PET/CT results. In group two, five patients in active stage had active FDG uptake and five patients in inactive stage had inactive FDG uptake with SUVmax values of several vascular lesions slightly lower than livermean in each person. The sensitivity of PET/CT scans for evaluating disease activity was 100.0%, specificity was 75.0%, positive predictive value was 87.5%, and negative predictive value was 100.0% compared to NIH criteria.
conclusionsPET/CT plays a unique role in diagnosing these TA with atypical manifestation and assisting in evaluating disease activity. Key Points • Diagnosis of these TA patients with atypical manifestations may be difficult. • PET/CT plays a unique role in diagnosing these TA patients and assisting in evaluating disease activity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.