ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2021
Temporal decline in the improved detection rates following OASIS workshops.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisTo evaluate the long-term sustainability of the effect of a hands-on workshop on the diagnosis of deliveries complicated by obstetrical anal sphincter injuries (OASIS).
methodsA population-based retrospective cohort study looking over a 4-year period, 1 year before and 3 years after an OASIS workshop. All deliveries that took place at the Soroka University Medical Center during the study period were included. Data were collected from the obstetrical electronic database. Interrupted time series analysis assessing the change in the OASIS detection rate over time from the workshop was conducted, assuming that the OASIS rate remained constant during the study period.
resultsDuring the study period, 147 parturients suffered from OASIS. The baseline characteristics of the patients before and after the workshop did not differ. In the year following the workshop a significant increase in the detection rate was noted compared with the year prior to the workshop. In an interrupted time series analysis, the improved detection rate declined with time. In the last year following the workshop the detection rate declined, almost reaching the pre-workshop rate.
conclusionsAttending an OASIS workshop increases the detection rate in the year following the workshop but declines gradually. To maximize its benefits, the workshop must be repeated periodically.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32561957What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.