ReviewDer Radiologe2020
[Radiological diagnostics of lumbar spine fractures].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe lumbar spine forms the lowermost part of the mobile spinal column. Due to anatomical properties, the lumbar spine is highly flexible in the sagittal directions, thus, rendering it susceptible to both flexion and extension forces with the thoracolumbar junction being the most vulnerable part of it. To date, the modern thoracolumbar spine fracture classification is given by the AOSpine classification system based on the well-known Magerl classification of vertebral fracture morphology but now includes both neurological criteria and clinical modifiers, such as ankylosing spondylitis. DIAGNOSTICS: Whereas plain radiography remains a mainstay in the diagnostic evaluation of low-energy trauma patients, computed tomography (CT) exhibits its unsurpassed power in polytrauma and plays a decisive role in all equivocal cases where the osseous situation is unclear. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly gaining importance for assessing both discoligamentous integrity and intraspinal condition. Both CT and MRI have direct input in classifying fractures according to the AOSpine classification.
resultsRegarding fracture morphology, three main types (A-C) based on the stability are distinguished. C‑type spinal injuries are all considered unstable, irrespective of type and severity of vertebral malalignment. Injuries to the anterior and posterior ligamentous complex are also considered to interfere with stability (B-type injuries).
conclusionsSpecial fracture patterns of the injured ankylosed and osteoporotic spine as well as of the pediatric lumbar spine are discussed. A survey is also given about several differential diagnoses (malignant fractures, anomalies, normal variants).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.