Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32561889›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2020

Macrophage phagocytosis assay with reconstituted target particles.

Aaron M Joffe, Matthew H Bakalar, Daniel A Fletcher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Microorganisms · 2025
    Article
  8. Functional Differences Between SIRPα Splice Isoforms.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Veterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Aaron M JoffeDepartment of Bioengineering and Biophysics Program, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Matthew H BakalarDepartment of Bioengineering and Biophysics Program, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Daniel A FletcherDepartment of Bioengineering and Biophysics Program, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA. fletch@berkeley.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1890-5364
Berkeley College · USBroad Institute · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Macrophage phagocytosis can be triggered by diverse receptor-ligand interactions to clear pathogens and dead cells from a host. Many ways of assaying phagocytosis exist that utilize a variety of phagocytic targets with different combinations of receptor-ligand interactions, making comparisons difficult. To study how phagocytosis is affected by specific changes to the target surface, we developed an in vitro assay based on reconstituted membrane-coated target particles to which known molecules can be added. The targets are made by coating glass beads with supported lipid bilayers followed by coupling proteins and other ligands of interest. Composition of the lipid bilayer can be varied to bind and orient specific proteins, incorporate signaling and reporter lipids, and control bilayer fluidity. To quantify phagocytosis, the reconstituted target particles are incubated with macrophages in vitro for a defined period of time, imaged with fluorescence microscopy and analyzed with software that measures the amount of target particle fluorescence within each macrophage. A multi-well plate format can be used for multi-parameter studies (e.g., to investigate how phagocytosis is affected by specific receptor-ligand interactions, ligand density, lipid charge, membrane fluidity and other molecular details). As an example, we demonstrate that antibody-dependent phagocytosis is more efficient for targets with fluid membranes than non-fluid membranes. The assay protocol takes approximately 6 h and requires basic molecular biology, mammalian cell culture and fluorescence microscopy skills. This assay can also be used with other phagocytic and non-phagocytic cells to study the individual or collective roles of receptors and ligands in immune effector function.

Indexed as

PhagocytosisAnimalsCytological TechniquesMacrophagesMiceRAW 264.7 Cells

Identifiers

PMID32561889
OpenAlexW3036982869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.