Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32561788›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Impact of genetic variants in clinical outcome of a cohort of patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Ana Carolina de Carvalho, Sandra Perdomo, Wellington Dos Santos, Gabriela Carvalho Fernandes, Lais Machado de Jesus, Raiany Santos Carvalho, Cristovam Scapulatempo-Neto, Gisele Caravina de Almeida, Bruna Pereira Sorroche, Lidia Maria Rebolho Batista Arantes and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Precision association of lymphatic disease spread with radiation-associated toxicity in oropharyngeal squamous carcinomas.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2021
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Ana Carolina de CarvalhoMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Sandra PerdomoInstitute of Nutrition, Genetics and Metabolism Research, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
Wellington Dos SantosMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Gabriela Carvalho FernandesCenter of Molecular Diagnosis, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Lais Machado de JesusMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Raiany Santos CarvalhoResearch Support Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Cristovam Scapulatempo-NetoMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Gisele Caravina de AlmeidaResearch Support Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Bruna Pereira SorrocheMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Lidia Maria Rebolho Batista ArantesMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Matias Eliseo MelendezMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Pedro De MarchiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
Neil HayesDepartment of Medicine, Division of Oncology, UTHSC Center for Cancer Research, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, USA.
Rui Manuel ReisMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil.
André Lopes CarvalhoMolecular Oncology Research Center, Barretos Cancer Hospital, Barretos, SP, Brazil. carvalhoal@gmail.com.
Hospital de Câncer de Barretos · BRCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRUniversidad El Bosque · COUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tobacco- or human papillomavirus- driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OpSCC) represent distinct clinical, biological and epidemiological entities. The aim of this study was to identify genetic variants based on somatic alterations in OpSCC samples from an admixed population, and to test for association with clinical features. The entire coding region of 15 OpSCC driver genes was sequenced by next-generation sequencing in 51 OpSCC FFPE samples. Thirty-five percent of the patients (18/51) were HPV-positive and current or past tobacco consumption was reported in 86.3% (44/51). The mutation profile identified an average of 2.67 variants per sample. Sixty-three percent of patients (32/51; 62.7%) were mutated for at least one of the genes tested and TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene. The presence of mutation in NOTCH1 and PTEN, significantly decreased patient's recurrence-free survival, but only NOTCH1 mutation remained significant after stepwise selection, with a risk of recurrence of 4.5 (HR 95% CI = 1.11-14.57; Cox Regression p = 0.034). These results show that Brazilian OpSCC patients exhibit a similar clinical and genetic profile in comparison to other populations. Molecular characterization is a promising tool for the definition of clinical subgroups, aiding in a more precise tailoring of treatment and prognostication.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellCohort StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsTobacco Products

Identifiers

PMID32561788
PMCPMC7305218
OpenAlexW3036684288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.