Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32561738›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Dual-comb photoacoustic spectroscopy.

Jacob T Friedlein, Esther Baumann, Kimberly A Briggman, Gabriel M Colacion, Fabrizio R Giorgetta, Aaron M Goldfain, Daniel I Herman, Eli V Hoenig, Jeeseong Hwang, Nathan R Newbury and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Quartz-enhanced laser spectroscopy sensing.Light, science & applications · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cavity-enhanced photoacoustic dual-comb spectroscopy.Light, science & applications · 2024
    Article
  11. Dual-comb optomechanical spectroscopy.Nature communications · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Dual-comb photothermal spectroscopy.Nature communications · 2022
    Article
  17. Optical ultrasound sensors for photoacoustic imaging: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2022
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jacob T FriedleinNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
Esther BaumannNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
Kimberly A BriggmanNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
Gabriel M ColacionNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
Fabrizio R GiorgettaNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
Aaron M GoldfainNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4119-3983
Daniel I HermanNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
Eli V HoenigNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
Jeeseong HwangNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
Nathan R NewburyNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
Edgar F PerezNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
Christopher S YungNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7912-6591
Ian CoddingtonNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA.
Kevin C CosselNational Institute of Standards and Technology, Applied Physics Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder, CO, 80305, USA. kevin.cossel@nist.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5416-2310

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spectrally resolved photoacoustic imaging is promising for label-free imaging in optically scattering materials. However, this technique often requires acquisition of a separate image at each wavelength of interest. This reduces imaging speeds and causes errors if the sample changes in time between images acquired at different wavelengths. We demonstrate a solution to this problem by using dual-comb spectroscopy for photoacoustic measurements. This approach enables a photoacoustic measurement at thousands of wavelengths simultaneously. In this technique, two optical-frequency combs are interfered on a sample and the resulting pressure wave is measured with an ultrasound transducer. This acoustic signal is processed in the frequency-domain to obtain an optical absorption spectrum. For a proof-of-concept demonstration, we measure photoacoustic signals from polymer films. The absorption spectra obtained from these measurements agree with those measured using a spectrophotometer. Improving the signal-to-noise ratio of the dual-comb photoacoustic spectrometer could enable high-speed spectrally resolved photoacoustic imaging.

Identifiers

PMID32561738
PMCPMC7305174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.