ArticleThe American journal of case reports2020
Ventricular Fibrillation 7 Years After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review of New-Onset Ventricular Arrhythmia after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.Cardiology · 2022Pooled it
- No Pulse, No Panic! Navigating Cardiac Arrest in LVAD-Supported Patients.Critical care clinics · 2026Review
- Resuscitation of patients with durable mechanical circulatory support with acutely altered perfusion or cardiac arrest: A scoping review.Resuscitation · 2024Article
- The role of atria in ventricular fibrillation after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation in ovine model.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Congestive heart failure (CHF) affects over 23 million individuals worldwide and over 5.8 million individuals in the United States. Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is used as both a bridging and destination therapy for patients with advanced CHF. LVADs are reported to cause ventricular arrhythmias. Ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation (VF) are common fatal arrhythmias in patients with severe CHF if left untreated. We report a case in which a patient with an LVAD without an implantable cardioverter device (ICD) developed VF with non-classical symptoms with an unknown duration prior to defibrillation. CASE REPORT A 74-year old man was brought to the hospital via Emergency Medical Services (EMS) with a 1-day history of altered mental status, somnolence, and slurred speech. His past medical history was significant for CHF with LVAD Heart Mate II. An initial electrocardiogram (ECG) done by EMS was abnormal but was presumed to be an artifact secondary to LVAD. A 12-lead ECG done in the Emergency Center revealed VF. He required electrical defibrillation. Due to ongoing multiple organ failure, he was admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for further care. CONCLUSIONS In the management of VF, the time to defibrillation is of paramount importance. LVAD patients could be in VF and present with non-specific symptoms. EMS personnel should be aware of this, as it can appear to be an artifact on ECG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.