Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32561513›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2020

"

Stephanie M Topp, Nicole B Carbone, Jennifer Tseka, Linda Kamtsendero, Godfrey Banda, Michael E Herce

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephanie M ToppCollege of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia globalstopp@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-3448-7983
Nicole B CarboneUniversity of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Jennifer TsekaUniversity of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Linda KamtsenderoUniversity of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Godfrey BandaUniversity of North Carolina Project, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Michael E HerceDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel HIll, North Carolina, USA.
James Cook University · AUUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Understanding Longitudinal Clinical Outcomes and Post-release Retention in Care among HIV-infected Prisoners in Lusaka, ZambiaK01TW010272 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI HERCE, MICHAEL EMMANUEL · 2015 to 2018
$538k
FIC NIH HHS K01 TW010272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the era of Option B+ and 'treat all' policies for HIV, challenges to retention in care are well documented. In Malawi, several large community-facility linkage (CFL) models have emerged to address these challenges, training lay health workers (LHW) to support the national prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) programme. This qualitative study sought to examine how PMTCT LHW deployed by Malawi's three most prevalent CFL models respond to known barriers to access and retention to antiretroviral therapy (ART) and PMTCT.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study, including 43 semi-structured interviews with PMTCT clients; 30 focus group discussions with Ministry of Health (MOH)-employed lay and professional providers and PMTCT LHWs; a facility CFL survey and 2-4 hours of onsite observation at each of 8 sites and in-depth interviews with 13 programme coordinators and MOH officials. Thematic analysis was used, combining inductive and deductive approaches.

resultsAcross all three models, PMTCT LHWs carried out a number of 'targeted' activities that respond directly to a range of known barriers to ART uptake and retention. These include: (i) fulfilling counselling and educational functions that responded to women's fears and uncertainties; (ii) enhancing women's social connectedness and participation in their own care and (iii) strengthening service function by helping clinic-based providers carry out duties more efficiently and effectively. Beyond absorbing workload or improving efficiency, however, PMTCT LHWs supported uptake and retention through foundational but often intangible work to strengthen CFL, including via efforts to strengthen facility-side responsiveness, and build community members' recognition of and trust in services.

conclusionPMTCT LHWs in each of the CFL models examined, addressed social, cultural and health system factors influencing client access to, and engagement with, HIV care and treatment. Findings underscore the importance of person-centred design in the 'treat-all' era and the contribution LHWs can make to this, but foreground the challenges of achieving person-centredness in the context of an under-resourced health system. Further work to understand the governance and sustainability of these project-funded CFL models and LHW cadres is now urgently required.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsMothersBreast FeedingChildFemaleHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMalawiPregnancyhealth services researchhealth systemsHIVmaternal healthpublic health

Identifiers

PMID32561513
PMCPMC7304641
OpenAlexW3035835606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.