Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32561491›Full record

ArticleWorld neurosurgery2020

Glass Fragment Injury to the Craniocervical Junction with Interatlantooccipital Penetration to the Subarachnoid Space: Not-To-Be-Missed Important Aspects of Craniocervical Trauma Even in the Middle of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Yuichiro Yoneoka, Katsuhiko Akiyama, Yasuhiro Seki

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in World neurosurgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yuichiro YoneokaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Uonuma Kikan Hospital, Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan. Electronic address: yone@bri.niigata-u.ac.jp.
Katsuhiko AkiyamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Uonuma Kikan Hospital, Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Yasuhiro SekiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Uonuma Kikan Hospital, Uonuma Institute of Community Medicine, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan.
Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNonmissile penetrating injuries to the craniocervical junction caused by a glass fragment are rare, and a standard management strategy has not been established. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 75-year-old Japanese man was brought into our emergency department after receiving a left retroauricular stab wound by broken glass fragments. After spinal immobilization, a computed tomography (CT) scan revealed glass fragments penetrating at the right craniocervical junction to the interatlantooccipital subarachnoid space. CT angiography showed that both vertebral arteries were not injured. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated that the glass fragments did not penetrate the cervical cord or medulla oblongata. These glass fragments were removed via a midline incision from the external occipital protuberance to the C7 and with laminectomy without suboccipital craniectomy. Five of the glass fragments were found and removed in total. The dural defect was patched with a free fascia autograft. His postoperative course was uneventful. Postoperative CT angiography showed that both vertebral arteries were intact and the glass fragments had been removed completely.

conclusionsCT graphical diagnosis is useful for the management of penetrating craniocervical junction trauma, and it should be considered in the evaluation of patients who have suffered craniocervical penetrating injury even in the absence of major wounds or bleeding. Spinal immobilization of patients with craniocervical penetrating injuries is crucial to avoid not only secondary neurologic damage but also secondary critical vascular damage. Incomplete or inadequate assessment of craniocervical stab wounds results in unexpected hazards that are preventable.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsGlassPandemicsPneumonia, ViralAgedAtlanto-Occipital JointCOVID-19HumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleSubarachnoid SpaceTomography, X-Ray ComputedTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds, PenetratingWounds, StabCraniocervical junctionCraniocervical traumatic injuryEmergency medicineGlass fragmentInteratlantooccipital penetrationNonmissile penetrating injurySpinal immobilization

Identifiers

PMID32561491
PMCPMC7297170
OpenAlexW3034895200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.