Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32561459›Full record

ArticleNeurobiology of learning and memory2020

Prefrontal oscillations modulate the propagation of neuronal activity required for working memory.

Jason Sherfey, Salva Ardid, Earl K Miller, Michael E Hasselmo, Nancy J Kopell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jason SherfeyCenter for Systems Neuroscience, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, MA 02215, United States; The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States; Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States. Electronic address: sherfey@bu.edu.
Salva ArdidDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States; Department of Comparative Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.
Earl K MillerThe Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States.
Michael E HasselmoCenter for Systems Neuroscience, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, MA 02215, United States.
Nancy J KopellDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, United States. Electronic address: nk@bu.edu.

Funding

Cortical Circuits for Attention and DecisionsR37MH087027 · NIMH · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MILLER, EARL K · 2010 to 2019
$4.7M
NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH087027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognition involves using attended information, maintained in working memory (WM), to guide action. During a cognitive task, a correct response requires flexible, selective gating so that only the appropriate information flows from WM to downstream effectors that carry out the response. In this work, we used biophysically-detailed modeling to explore the hypothesis that network oscillations in prefrontal cortex (PFC), leveraging local inhibition, can independently gate responses to items in WM. The key role of local inhibition was to control the period between spike bursts in the outputs, and to produce an oscillatory response no matter whether the WM item was maintained in an asynchronous or oscillatory state. We found that the WM item that induced an oscillatory population response in the PFC output layer with the shortest period between spike bursts was most reliably propagated. The network resonant frequency (i.e., the input frequency that produces the largest response) of the output layer can be flexibly tuned by varying the excitability of deep layer principal cells. Our model suggests that experimentally-observed modulation of PFC beta-frequency (15-30 Hz) and gamma-frequency (30-80 Hz) oscillations could leverage network resonance and local inhibition to govern the flexible routing of signals in service to cognitive processes like gating outputs from working memory and the selection of rule-based actions. Importantly, we show for the first time that nonspecific changes in deep layer excitability can tune the output gate's resonant frequency, enabling the specific selection of signals encoded by populations in asynchronous or fast oscillatory states. More generally, this represents a dynamic mechanism by which adjusting network excitability can govern the propagation of asynchronous and oscillatory signals throughout neocortex.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerBeta RhythmElectroencephalographyGamma RhythmHumansMemory, Short-TermNeuronsPrefrontal CortexBeta rhythmCognitionGamma rhythmGatingResonanceWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID32561459
PMCPMC7429344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.