ArticleJournal of environmental management2020
Environmental sustainability of European production and consumption assessed against planetary boundaries.
Article in Journal of environmental management, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Parametric Life Cycle Assessment of Chemical Recycling of Nylon-6 to Caprolactam.Environmental science & technology · 2026Article
- Three-Tier Plate, Triple Win: Health, Sustainability, and Equity in the Slovenian Nutrition Guidelines 2025.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Analysis of planetary boundaries and economic assessment for waste valorization in the context of a biorefinery: case study of the corn value chain in Sucre, Colombia.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
- Operationalizing the environmental safe operating space into target distributions for mobility and batteries.Npj sustainable mobility and transport · 2026Article
- An ecosystem of carbon dioxide removal reviews - part 1: direct air COEnergy & environmental science · 2025Review
- Sustainable Development Goals-Based Prospective Process Design Using Hybrid Modeling.Industrial & engineering chemistry research · 2025Article
- Environmental impacts of restructuring the EU's natural gas supply and consumption: Learnings from the 2022 energy crisis.iScience · 2025Article
- The impact of evolving mix on building's life cycle environmental impacts under climate change: insights from a London office case study.The international journal of life cycle assessment · 2025Article
- The environmental sustainability of digital content consumption.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Environmental Sustainability of Alternative Ways to Produce Benzene, Toluene, and Xylene.ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering · 2024Article
- Assessing economic sustainability and resilience of tomato farming ventures in Addis Ababa: A project-based evaluation.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Eco-Design of Polymer Matrix Composite Parts: A Review.Polymers · 2023Review
- Trade-offs between Sustainable Development Goals in carbon capture and utilisation.Energy & environmental science · 2023Article
- Life Cycle Assessment support to environmental ambitions of EU policies and the Sustainable Development Goals.Integrated environmental assessment and management · 2022Article
- A Sustainability Compass for policy navigation to sustainable food systems.Global food security · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The planetary boundaries (PBs) represent a well-known concept, which helps identify whether production and consumption systems are environmentally sustainable in absolute terms, namely compared to the Earth's ecological limits and carrying capacity. In this study, the impacts of production and consumption of the European Union in 2010 were assessed by means of life cycle assessment (LCA)-based indicators and compared with the PBs. Five different perspectives were adopted for assessing the impacts: a production perspective (EU Domestic Footprint) and four distinct consumption perspectives, resulting from alternative modelling approaches including both top-down (input-output LCA) and bottom-up (process-based LCA). Life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) results were assessed against LCIA-based PBs, which adapted the PBs framework to the LCIA indicators and metrics of the Environmental Footprint method (EF). Global environmental impacts transgressed several LCIA-based PBs. When assessing the overall environmental impacts of EU consumption compared to the global LCIA-based PBs, impacts of EU consumption related to climate change, particulate matter, land use and mineral resources were close or already transgressed the global boundaries. The EU, with less than 10% of the world population, was close to transgress the global ecological limits. Moreover, when downscaling the global PBs and comparing the impacts per capita for an average EU citizen and a global one, the LCIA-PBs were significantly transgressed in many impact categories. The results are affected by uncertainty mainly due to: (a) the intrinsic uncertainties of the different LCA modelling approaches and indicators; (b) the uncertainties in estimating LCIA-based PBs, due to the difficulties in identifying limits for the Earth's processes and referring them to LCIA metrics. The results may anyway be used to define benchmarks and policy targets to ensure that consumption and production in Europe remains within safe ecological boundaries, as well as to understand the magnitude of the effort needed to reduce the impacts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.