SynthesisBMC public health2020
Sustainable by design: a systematic review of factors for health promotion program sustainability.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Underlying strategies of scaling up and sustaining physical activity interventions.Frontiers in health services · 2026Pooled it
- What makes community-based, multilevel physical activity promotion last? A systematic review with narrative synthesis on factors for sustainable implementation.Perspectives in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Sustainability of breastfeeding interventions to reduce child mortality rates in low, middle-income countries: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in health services · 2022Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators influencing the sustainment of health behaviour interventions in schools and childcare services: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2021Pooled it
- Sustainability of implementation of health-promotion practice in primary healthcare: a non-randomized parallel group study.BMC health services research · 2026Trial
- Action planning for building public health program sustainability: results from a group-randomized trial.Implementation science : IS · 2024Trial
- Examining the sustainability and effectiveness of co-created physical activity interventions in vocational education and training: a multimethod evaluation.BMC public health · 2022Trial
- Stakeholders' experiences of physical activity programmes development, implementation, and evaluation in universities in the United Kingdom and Indonesia.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026Article
- Basic Technology to Support Stimulation Access, Activity, and Correct Posture in Individuals With Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities: Development and Usability Study.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2026Article
- Systemic and organizational barriers to primary chronic disease prevention: a qualitative study of public health organizations in Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2026Article
- Evaluating the sustainability of a three-year community-based intergenerational project in Hong Kong: a longitudinal mixed methods study from the perspective of service providers.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Sustaining Healthy Communities in rural settings: lessons from multisectoral teams in Alberta, Canada.Health promotion international · 2026Article
- One health-sustainability intersections: an umbrella systematic review with a new integrated definition of sustainability and a meta-conceptual framework.One health outlook · 2025Review
- Barriers and implementation strategies for physical activity on prescription (PAP): healthcare personnel and management perspectives in Sweden-An explanatory sequential study design.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- From 'What's This?' To 'I Grew It!': Evaluation of a School Nutrition Program in Queensland, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025Article
- Balancing Fidelity and Adaptation: Action-Oriented Research Towards Implementing a Nutrition Education Program Among Adolescents.The Journal of school health · 2025Article
- Sustainability of fall prevention exercise programmes for community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Concentration and geospatial modelling of Health Development Offices' accessibility for the total and elderly populations in Hungary.BMC public health · 2025Article
- The sustainability of health interventions implemented in Africa: an updated systematic review on evidence and future research perspectives.Implementation science communications · 2025Review
- Assessing the transferability potential of policy practices for older people.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSustaining health promotion programs (HPP) is critical to maintain their intended health benefits, community capacity, and to optimize resources and investment. However, not all programs are sustained beyond their initial implementation period. This is partly due to uncertainty regarding sustainability: lack of a clear definition; infrequent use of a sustainability framework; and lack of understanding of the factors that influence sustainability. The aim of this systematic review is to identify barriers and facilitators that promote or inhibit the sustainability of HPP, particularly those that can be considered in program planning.
methodsTwo search strategies were used: 1) electronic database searching; and 2) grey literature searching. Inclusion criteria included papers published since 1998, in English, focusing on the sustainability of HPP that explicitly used a sustainability framework and specifically reported on facilitators and barriers to sustainability. Exclusion criteria included papers that addressed environmental, system or sector sustainability. Quality assessment was conducted on all included papers and a quality assessment tool was developed for grey literature. Data analysis included a thematic analysis, using an a priori framework to initially code barriers and facilitators, which were then grouped into factors for HPP sustainability. Factors were then analyzed for frequency, importance, and relevance, and categorized into one of three tiers.
resultsSixteen papers were included in this review. Eleven definitions of sustainability and 13 sustainability frameworks were used. A total of 83 barriers and 191 facilitators were identified and categorized into 14 factors: nine from the a priori framework, and five additional ones based on the results of our analysis. Tier 1 factors were the most important for sustainability with organizational capacity scoring the highest; tier 3, the least important.
conclusionThis review provides clarity regarding existing definitions of sustainability and sustainability frameworks. It identifies fourteen factors that influence program sustainability, which practitioners can consider when planning, developing and implementing HPP. In addition, it is important for practitioners to clearly articulate program elements that should be sustained, define sustainability as it relates to the context of their program, select a sustainability framework to guide their work, and consider these factors for sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.