Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32560661›Full record

SynthesisImplementation science : IS2020

Quantitative measures of health policy implementation determinants and outcomes: a systematic review.

Peg Allen, Meagan Pilar, Callie Walsh-Bailey, Cole Hooley, Stephanie Mazzucca, Cara C Lewis, Kayne D Mettert, Caitlin N Dorsey, Jonathan Purtle, Maura M Kepper and 2 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 84 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05466656 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project: Assessment of Implementation of Best Practices in a National Health System (Second Edition)

TypeinterventionalSponsorTeresa Moreno CasbasRan2021 to 2024Enrolled115ConditionsPain, Incontinence, Urinary, Obesity, Childhood, BreastfeedingArmsContinuous quality improvement cycle model
NCT06522529 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

SUMAMOS EXCELENCIA Project: Assessment of Implementation of Best Practices in a National Health System (Thrid Edition)

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIRan2024 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsPain, Obesity, Childhood, Breast Feeding, Incontinence, UrinaryArmsMultifaceted implementation strategy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review investigating policy design and implementation of US state and local policy to restrict the sale of flavored tobacco products.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Sustaining perioperative patient safety improvement: the relevance of patient safety policies and contextual factors in European healthcare systems.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Peg AllenPrevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA. pegallen@wustl.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-7000-796X
Meagan PilarPrevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Callie Walsh-BaileyPrevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Cole HooleySchool of Social Work, Brigham Young University, 2190 FJSB, Provo, UT, 84602, USA.
Stephanie MazzuccaPrevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Cara C LewisKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Kayne D MettertKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Caitlin N DorseyKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, 1730 Minor Ave, Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Jonathan PurtleDepartment of Health Management & Policy, Drexel University Dornsife School of Public Health, Nesbitt Hall, 3215 Market St, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Maura M KepperPrevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Ana A BaumannBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Ross C BrownsonPrevention Research Center, Brown School, Washington University in St. Louis, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.

Funding

WU INSTITUTE OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1TR002345 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI William G. Powderly · 2017 to 2026
$97.8M
WU P&FP30DK020579 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Clay F. Semenkovich · 2013 to 2026
$27.1M
Washington University Center for Diabetes Translation Research P30DK092950 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Ross C Brownson, Debra Haire-Joshu · 2011 to 2026
$11.7M
Washington University Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control (WU-ISCCC)P50CA244431 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C, COLDITZ, GRAHAM A. · 2019 to 2023
$8.0M
Advancing Implementation Science through Measure Development and EvaluationR01MH106510 · NIMH · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI LEWIS, CARA CHARISSA · 2015 to 2017
$1.3M
ACL HHS U48DP006395CDC HHS U48DP006395-01-00NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002345NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006395NCI NIH HHS P50 CA244431NCI NIH HHS P50CA244431NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK020579NIDDK NIH HHS P30DK020579NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092950NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH106510NIMH NIH HHS R01MH106510
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPublic policy has tremendous impacts on population health. While policy development has been extensively studied, policy implementation research is newer and relies largely on qualitative methods. Quantitative measures are needed to disentangle differential impacts of policy implementation determinants (i.e., barriers and facilitators) and outcomes to ensure intended benefits are realized. Implementation outcomes include acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, compliance/fidelity, feasibility, penetration, sustainability, and costs. This systematic review identified quantitative measures that are used to assess health policy implementation determinants and outcomes and evaluated the quality of these measures.

methodsThree frameworks guided the review: Implementation Outcomes Framework (Proctor et al.), Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (Damschroder et al.), and Policy Implementation Determinants Framework (Bullock et al.). Six databases were searched: Medline, CINAHL Plus, PsycInfo, PAIS, ERIC, and Worldwide Political. Searches were limited to English language, peer-reviewed journal articles published January 1995 to April 2019. Search terms addressed four levels: health, public policy, implementation, and measurement. Empirical studies of public policies addressing physical or behavioral health with quantitative self-report or archival measures of policy implementation with at least two items assessing implementation outcomes or determinants were included. Consensus scoring of the Psychometric and Pragmatic Evidence Rating Scale assessed the quality of measures.

resultsDatabase searches yielded 8417 non-duplicate studies, with 870 (10.3%) undergoing full-text screening, yielding 66 studies. From the included studies, 70 unique measures were identified to quantitatively assess implementation outcomes and/or determinants. Acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and compliance were the most commonly measured implementation outcomes. Common determinants in the identified measures were organizational culture, implementation climate, and readiness for implementation, each aspects of the internal setting. Pragmatic quality ranged from adequate to good, with most measures freely available, brief, and at high school reading level. Few psychometric properties were reported.

conclusionsWell-tested quantitative measures of implementation internal settings were under-utilized in policy studies. Further development and testing of external context measures are warranted. This review is intended to stimulate measure development and high-quality assessment of health policy implementation outcomes and determinants to help practitioners and researchers spread evidence-informed policies to improve population health. REGISTRATION: Not registered.

Indexed as

Health PolicyImplementation ScienceAttitude of Health PersonnelGuideline AdherenceHumansOrganizational CulturePractice Guidelines as TopicPsychometricsHealth policyImplementationImplementation scienceMeasuresPolicy implementationPragmaticPsychometricPublic policySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32560661
PMCPMC7304175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.