ArticleBMC surgery2020
Single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernias repair in girls: using an epidural needle assisted by a towel forceps.
Article in BMC surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single-port laparoscopic hernia needle therapy: New hope for the treatment of inguinal hernia in children.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Laparoscopic Hernia Repair with the Extraperitoneal Approach versus Open Hernia Repair in Pediatric Inguinal Hernia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Umbilical two-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for patent processus vaginalis in boys: incision-hiding and solo-like surgery.BMC surgery · 2021Article
- A comparative study examining laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair in children: a retrospective study from a single center in China.BMC surgery · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe concept of single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for the treatment of inguinal hernias repair in children has been practising recent years. The applicable instruments and skills are still evolving. In this study, we used an epidural needle assisted by a towel forceps to practise this minimal invasive method for inguinal hernias repair in girls. Its safety and effectiveness were studied.
methodsFrom July 2008 to January 2020, thirty-five girls diagnosed of indirect inguinal hernias were studied retrospectively. From April 2017 to January 2020, the author was free to propose open or laparoscopic repair for the patients. The open group included twenty-four girls and the laparoscopic group included eleven. The data of the patients age, constituent ratios of sliding and bilateral hernias, operating time, postoperative time in hospital, follow-up time, conversion, postoperative complications were assessed.
resultsThere were no statistically significant difference between the laparoscopic group and open group for the following items: age, operating time, postoperative time in hospital, the constituent ratios of sliding hernia and bilateral hernias (P > 0.05). The follow-up time of the open group was longer than that of the laparoscopic group (P = 0.0004). One laparoscopic case was converted to open surgery. After 12 cases of laparoscopic practice, coordination of the hand and eye movements established well. There were no postoperative complications for all the patients.
conclusionOur preliminary experience suggested that it is safe and convenient for inguinal hernias repair in girls by the single-port laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure method using an epidural needle assisted by a towel forceps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.