Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32560644›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Midazolam sedation in palliative medicine: retrospective study in a French center for cancer control.

Vincent Gamblin, Vincent Berry, Emmanuelle Tresch-Bruneel, Michel Reich, Arlette Da Silva, Stéphanie Villet, Nicolas Penel, Chloé Prod'Homme

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Vincent GamblinPalliative care unit, Oscar Lambret center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020, Lille, France. v-gamblin@o-lambret.fr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8509-4733
Vincent BerryPalliative care unit, Maison Médicale Jean XXIII, 3 Place Erasme de Rotterdam, 59160, Lille, France.
Emmanuelle Tresch-BruneelDirection of Research and Innovation, Oscar Lambret center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020, Lille, France.
Michel ReichPalliative care unit, Oscar Lambret center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020, Lille, France.
Arlette Da SilvaPalliative care unit, Oscar Lambret center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020, Lille, France.
Stéphanie VilletPalliative care unit, Oscar Lambret center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020, Lille, France.
Nicolas PenelDirection of Research and Innovation, Oscar Lambret center, 3 rue Frédéric Combemale, 59020, Lille, France.
Chloé Prod'HommeLille University Hospital and Medical School, Palliative care unit, 59000, Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFrench legislation about sedation in palliative medicine evolved in 2016 with the introduction of a right to deep and continuous sedation, maintained until death. The objective was to describe midazolam sedation at the COL (Centre Oscar Lambret [Oscar Lambret Center], French regional center for cancer control), in order to establish a current overview before the final legislative changes.

methodsDescriptive, retrospective and single-center study, concerning major patients in palliative care hospitalized from 01/01/2014 to 12/31/2015, who had been sedated by midazolam. The proven sedations (explicitly named) and the probable sedations were distinguished.

resultsA total of 54 sedations were identified (48 proven, 6 probable). Refractory symptoms accounted for 48.1% of indications, complications with immediate risk of death 46.3%, existential suffering 5.6%. Titration was performed in 44.4% of cases. Sedation was continuous until death for 98.1% of the cases. Probable sedation had a higher failure rate than proven sedation. Significant differences existed for the palliative care unit compared to other units regarding information to the patient, their consent, anticipation, mention by correspondence and carrying out titrations. When patients had already been treated with midazolam, the induction doses, initial maintenance doses, and doses at the time of death were significantly higher. For those receiving opioids, the maintenance dose at the time of death was higher. No comparison found a difference in overall survival.

conclusionsAfter a sufficient follow-up has enabled teams to familiarize with this new legislation, reflection on sedation should be conducted to adapt to final recommendations.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFranceHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleMidazolamMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPalliative CareRetrospective StudiesHypnotics and SedativesMidazolamMidazolamOncologyPalliative careSedation

Identifiers

PMID32560644
PMCPMC7305615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.