Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32560632›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2020

Study protocol of the HYPER-LIV01 trial: a multicenter phase II, prospective and randomized study comparing simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization to portal vein embolization for hypertrophy of the future liver remnant before major hepatectomy for colo-rectal liver metastases.

Emmanuel Deshayes, Lauranne Piron, Antoine Bouvier, Bruno Lapuyade, Emilie Lermite, Laurent Vervueren, Christophe Laurent, Jean-Baptiste Pinaquy, Patrick Chevallier, Anthony Dohan and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03841305 (Simultaneous Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization Versus Portal Vein Embolization for Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant Before Major Hepatectomy of Non-cirrhotic Liver), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03841305 phase2completednot on this map

Simultaneous Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization Versus Portal Vein Embolization for Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant Before Major Hepatectomy of Non-cirrhotic Liver : a Multicentric Comparative Randomized Phase II Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, MontpellierRan2019 to 2024Enrolled64ConditionsLiver Metastasis Colon CancerArmsLiver preparation before major hepatectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Advanced robotic liver surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuel DeshayesInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, University of Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France.
Lauranne PironDepartment of Radiology, Saint Eloi University Hospital, 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, F-34295, Montpellier, France.
Antoine BouvierDepartment of Radiology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Bruno LapuyadeDepartment of Radiology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Emilie LermiteDepartment of Liver surgery, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Laurent VervuerenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Christophe LaurentDepartment of Liver surgery, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Jean-Baptiste PinaquyDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Patrick ChevallierDepartment of Radiology, Nice University Hospital, Nice, France.
Anthony DohanDepartment of Radiology, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
Agnès RodeDepartment of Radiology, Croix Rousse Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Christian SengelDepartment of Radiology, Grenoble University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Chloé GuillotDepartment of Radiology, Saint Eloi University Hospital, 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, F-34295, Montpellier, France.
François QuenetDepartment of Surgery, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Boris GuiuDepartment of Radiology, Saint Eloi University Hospital, 80 avenue Augustin Fliche, F-34295, Montpellier, France. b-guiu@chu-montpellier.fr.
Hôpital Saint Eloi · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers · FRInstitut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRBordeaux Population Health · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité d'Angers · FRUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

Institut National Du Cancer K17-019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients undergoing major liver resection, portal vein embolization (PVE) has been widely used to induce hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver in order to prevent post-hepatectomy liver failure. PVE is a safe and effective procedure, but does not always lead to sufficient hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). Hepatic vein(s) embolization has been proposed to improve FLR regeneration when insufficient after PVE. The sequential right hepatic vein embolization (HVE) after right PVE demonstrated an incremental effect on the FLR but it implies two different procedures with no time gain as compared to PVE alone. We have developed the so-called liver venous deprivation (LVD), a combination of PVE and HVE during the same intervention, to optimize the phase of liver preparation before surgery. The main objective of this randomized phase II trial is to compare the percentage of change in FLR volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE.

methodsPatients eligible to this multicenter prospective randomized phase II study are subjects aged from 18 years old suffering from colo-rectal liver metastases considered as resectable and with non-cirrhotic liver parenchyma. The primary objective is the percentage of change in FLR volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE using MRI or CT-Scan. Secondary objectives are assessment of tolerance, post-operative morbidity and mortality, post-hepatectomy liver failure, rate of non-respectability due to insufficient FLR or tumor progression, per-operative difficulties, blood loss, R0 resection rate, post-operative liver volume and overall survival. Objectives of translational research studies are evaluation of pre- and post-operative liver function and determination of biomarkers predictive of liver hypertrophy. Sixty-four patients will be included (randomization ratio 1:1) to detect a difference of 12% at 21 days in FLR volumes between PVE and LVD. DISCUSSION: Adding HVE to PVE during the same procedure is an innovative and promising approach that may lead to a rapid and major increase in volume and function of the FLR, thereby increasing the rate of resectable patients and limiting the risk of patient's drop-out.

trial registrationThis study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on 15th February 2019 (NCT03841305).

Indexed as

AdultClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicColorectal NeoplasmsEmbolization, TherapeuticFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatectomyHepatomegalyHumansLiverLiver FailureLiver NeoplasmsLiver RegenerationMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicColo-rectal cancerLiver metastasesMajor hepatectomyPortal vein embolizationVenous deprivation

Identifiers

PMID32560632
PMCPMC7304136
OpenAlexW3036475194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.