ArticleBMC cancer2020
Study protocol of the HYPER-LIV01 trial: a multicenter phase II, prospective and randomized study comparing simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization to portal vein embolization for hypertrophy of the future liver remnant before major hepatectomy for colo-rectal liver metastases.
Article in BMC cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03841305 (Simultaneous Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization Versus Portal Vein Embolization for Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant Before Major Hepatectomy of Non-cirrhotic Liver), which is not on this map. Cited by 35 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Simultaneous Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization Versus Portal Vein Embolization for Hypertrophy of the Future Liver Remnant Before Major Hepatectomy of Non-cirrhotic Liver : a Multicentric Comparative Randomized Phase II Trial
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- CIRSE Standards of Practice on Portal Vein Embolization and Double Vein Embolization/Liver Venous Deprivation.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2024Guideline
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of liver venous deprivation versus portal vein embolization before hepatectomy: future liver volume, postoperative outcomes, and oncological safety.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- To Systematically Evaluate and Analyze the Efficacy and Safety of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization (TACE) in the Treatment of Primary Liver Cancer.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Pooled it
- When is enough enough?-predicting adequacy of portal vein embolization for hypertrophy of the future liver remnant in the age of liver venous deprivation.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Hypertrophy Induction by Portal Vein Embolization with PVA Particles and Iodinated Oil: A Single Center Study with 103 Patients.RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin · 2026Article
- Advanced robotic liver surgery.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Review
- Liver hypertrophy techniques: a position paper from the Italian Group of Regenerative and Occlusive Worldwide-used techniques of hepatic Hypertrophy (I GROWtoH).Updates in surgery · 2025Article
- Portal and hepatic vein(s) embolization as a preparation for major hepatectomy: Enough is enough or more is better?Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2025Article
- Combined Portal and Hepatic Vein Embolization Produces Greater Hypertrophy than Portal Vein Embolization Alone with Similar Post-Hepatectomy Outcomes and is not Impacted by Hepatic Artery Infusion Chemotherapy.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- ASO Author Reflections: Augmenting the Future Liver Remnant Prior to Major Hepatectomy: A Review of Options on the Menu.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Augmenting the Future Liver Remnant Prior to Major Hepatectomy: A Review of Options on the Menu.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Impact of CT-Assessed Liver Steatosis in Hepatic Regeneration and Surgical Outcome After Liver Venous Deprivation.Cardiovascular and interventional radiology · 2025Article
- Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Liver Venous Deprivation and Portal Vein Embolization Before Planned Hepatectomy in Patients with Extensive Colorectal Liver Metastases and High-Risk Factors for Inadequate Regeneration.Annals of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Molecular mechanisms in liver repair and regeneration: from physiology to therapeutics.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Liver venous deprivation (LVD) before extended hepatectomy: a French multicentric retrospective cohort.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Review of Future Liver Remnant (FLR) Assessment and Hypertrophy Techniques Before Major Hepatectomy: How to Assess and Manage the FLR.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Review
- Preoperative imaging of colorectal liver metastases: what the radiologist and the multidisciplinary team need to know.The British journal of radiology · 2024Review
- Transfemoral hepatic vein access in double vein embolization - initial experience and feasibility.CVIR endovascular · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn patients undergoing major liver resection, portal vein embolization (PVE) has been widely used to induce hypertrophy of the non-embolized liver in order to prevent post-hepatectomy liver failure. PVE is a safe and effective procedure, but does not always lead to sufficient hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). Hepatic vein(s) embolization has been proposed to improve FLR regeneration when insufficient after PVE. The sequential right hepatic vein embolization (HVE) after right PVE demonstrated an incremental effect on the FLR but it implies two different procedures with no time gain as compared to PVE alone. We have developed the so-called liver venous deprivation (LVD), a combination of PVE and HVE during the same intervention, to optimize the phase of liver preparation before surgery. The main objective of this randomized phase II trial is to compare the percentage of change in FLR volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE.
methodsPatients eligible to this multicenter prospective randomized phase II study are subjects aged from 18 years old suffering from colo-rectal liver metastases considered as resectable and with non-cirrhotic liver parenchyma. The primary objective is the percentage of change in FLR volume at 3 weeks after LVD or PVE using MRI or CT-Scan. Secondary objectives are assessment of tolerance, post-operative morbidity and mortality, post-hepatectomy liver failure, rate of non-respectability due to insufficient FLR or tumor progression, per-operative difficulties, blood loss, R0 resection rate, post-operative liver volume and overall survival. Objectives of translational research studies are evaluation of pre- and post-operative liver function and determination of biomarkers predictive of liver hypertrophy. Sixty-four patients will be included (randomization ratio 1:1) to detect a difference of 12% at 21 days in FLR volumes between PVE and LVD. DISCUSSION: Adding HVE to PVE during the same procedure is an innovative and promising approach that may lead to a rapid and major increase in volume and function of the FLR, thereby increasing the rate of resectable patients and limiting the risk of patient's drop-out.
trial registrationThis study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov on 15th February 2019 (NCT03841305).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.