Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32560564›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Overcoming Platinum and PARP-Inhibitor Resistance in Ovarian Cancer.

Michelle McMullen, Katherine Karakasis, Ainhoa Madariaga, Amit M Oza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Science translational medicine · 2023
    Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michelle McMullenDivision of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Family Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Katherine KarakasisDivision of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Family Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
Ainhoa MadariagaDivision of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Family Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7166-9762
Amit M OzaDivision of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Bras Family Drug Development Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 2M9, Canada.
University Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Platinum chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) and Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) now have an established role as maintenance therapy. The mechanisms of action of these agents is, in many ways, complementary, and crucially reliant on the intracellular DNA Damage Repair (DDR) response. Here, we review mechanisms of primary and acquired resistance to treatment with platinum and PARPi, examining the interplay between both classes of agents. A key resistance mechanism appears to be the restoration of the Homologous Recombination (HR) repair pathway, through

Indexed as

homologous recombinationovarian cancerPARPplatinumresistance mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID32560564
PMCPMC7352566
OpenAlexW3035853607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.