ArticleCancers2020
Automated Classification of Significant Prostate Cancer on MRI: A Systematic Review on the Performance of Machine Learning Applications.
Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05024162 (Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate Combined With a Radiomics Evaluation Determine the Invasive Capacity of a Tumour), which is not on this map. Cited by 41 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Can Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate Combined With a Radiomics Evaluation Determine the Invasive Capacity of a Tumour (Can MRI-PREDICT)
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial Intelligence Performance in Image-Based Cancer Identification: Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Pooled it
- Systematic review of the radiomics quality score applications: an EuSoMII Radiomics Auditing Group Initiative.European radiology · 2023Pooled it
- Current progress and quality of radiomic studies for predicting EGFR mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer using PET/CT images: a systematic review.The British journal of radiology · 2021Pooled it
- A systematic review of radiomics in osteosarcoma: utilizing radiomics quality score as a tool promoting clinical translation.European radiology · 2021Pooled it
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in prostate MRI: A rapid scoping review highlighting limited evidence in screening context.European journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Multi-regional Multiparametric Deep Learning Radiomics for Diagnosis of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Combined radiomics, PI-RADS, and clinical model improve significant prostate cancer prediction and guide biopsy decision.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- From Lab to Clinic: Artificial Intelligence with Spectroscopic Liquid Biopsies.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Machine learning models for discriminating clinically significant from clinically insignificant prostate cancer using bi-parametric magnetic resonance imagingDiagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2025Article
- Relational Ethics in the Administration of Healthcare Technology: AI, Automation and Proper Distance.Sociology of health & illness · 2025Article
- ProstAtlasDiff: Prostate cancer detection on MRI using Diffusion Probabilistic Models guided by population spatial cancer atlases.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- Cross-shaped windows transformer with self-supervised pretraining for clinically significant prostate cancer detection in bi-parametric MRI.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Personalized optimization of systematic prostate biopsy core number based on mpMRI radiomics features: a large-sample retrospective analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- From molecular mechanisms of prostate cancer to translational applications: based on multi-omics fusion analysis and intelligent medicine.Health information science and systems · 2024Review
- Review
- MRI-based prostate cancer classification using 3D efficient capsule network.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Golden eagle optimized CONV-LSTM and non-negativity-constrained autoencoder to support spatial and temporal features in cancer drug response prediction.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Exploring the efficacy of multi-flavored feature extraction with radiomics and deep features for prostate cancer grading on mpMRI.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Clinical-Genomic Risk Group Classification of Suspicious Lesions on Prostate Multiparametric-MRI.Cancers · 2023Article
- MRI-Based Surrogate Imaging Markers of Aggressiveness in Prostate Cancer: Development of a Machine Learning Model Based on Radiomic Features.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Significant prostate carcinoma (sPCa) classification based on MRI using radiomics or deep learning approaches has gained much interest, due to the potential application in assisting in clinical decision-making.
objectiveTo systematically review the literature (i) to determine which algorithms are most frequently used for sPCa classification, (ii) to investigate whether there exists a relation between the performance and the method or the MRI sequences used, (iii) to assess what study design factors affect the performance on sPCa classification, and (iv) to research whether performance had been evaluated in a clinical setting Methods: The databases Embase and Ovid MEDLINE were searched for studies describing machine learning or deep learning classification methods discriminating between significant and nonsignificant PCa on multiparametric MRI that performed a valid validation procedure. Quality was assessed by the modified radiomics quality score. We computed the median area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) from overall methods and the interquartile range.
resultsFrom 2846 potentially relevant publications, 27 were included. The most frequent algorithms used in the literature for PCa classification are logistic regression (22%) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) (22%). The median AUC was 0.79 (interquartile range: 0.77-0.87). No significant effect of number of included patients, image sequences, or reference standard on the reported performance was found. Three studies described an external validation and none of the papers described a validation in a prospective clinical trial.
conclusionsTo unlock the promising potential of machine and deep learning approaches, validation studies and clinical prospective studies should be performed with an established protocol to assess the added value in decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.