Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32560496›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Sex and Gender in Research on Healthcare Workers in Conflict Settings: A Scoping Review.

Rima R Habib, Dana A Halwani, Diana Mikati, Layal Hneiny

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rima R HabibDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0001-6280-7238
Dana A HalwaniDepartment of Environmental Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Diana MikatiFaculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.
Layal HneinySaab Medical Library, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0003-1073-4879

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The occupational health literature has established that sex and gender are associated with all dimensions of the workplace. Sex and/or gender (sex/gender) factors play an important role in shaping the experiences, exposures, and health outcomes of male and female healthcare providers working in war and conflict settings. This study aims to (1) assess how sex/gender is considered in the occupational health literature on healthcare workers in conflict settings, and (2) identify the gaps in incorporating sex/gender concepts in this literature. A scoping review was carried out and nine electronic databases were searched using a comprehensive search strategy. Two reviewers screened the titles/abstracts and full-texts of the studies using specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Key information was extracted from the studies and four themes were identified. Of 7679 identified records, 47 were included for final review. The findings underlined the harsh working conditions of healthcare workers practicing in conflict zones and showed sex/gender similarities and differences in experiences, exposures and health outcomes. This review revealed a dearth of articles with adequate consideration of sex/gender in the study design. Sex/gender-sensitive research in occupational health is necessary to develop effective occupational health and safety policies to protect men and women healthcare workers in conflict settings.

Indexed as

Gender IdentityHealth PersonnelOccupational HealthText MessagingAdultDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleSex Factorsconflictgenderhealthcare workersoccupational health and safetyscoping reviewsexwar

Identifiers

PMID32560496
PMCPMC7346087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.