Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32560446›Full record

ArticleMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Preliminary Environmental Assessment of Epoxidized Sucrose Soyate (ESS)-Based Biocomposite.

Shokoofeh Ghasemi, Mukund P Sibi, Chad A Ulven, Dean C Webster, Ghasideh Pourhashem

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shokoofeh GhasemiDepartment of Coatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.
Mukund P SibiDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1999-4167
Chad A UlvenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3187-7617
Dean C WebsterDepartment of Coatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5765-9514
Ghasideh PourhashemDepartment of Coatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5979-8534

Funding

NDSU Development Foundation 43500 - 2760 - FAR0031216North Dakota State University Coatings and Polymeric Materials
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biocomposites can be both environmentally and economically beneficial: during their life cycle they generally use and generate less petroleum-based carbon, and when produced from the byproduct of another industry or recycled back to the manufacturing process, they will bring additional economic benefits through contributing to a circular economy. Here we investigate and compare the environmental performance of a biocomposite composed of a soybean oil-based resin (epoxidized sucrose soyate) and flax-based reinforcement using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. We evaluate the main environmental impacts that are generated during the production of the bio-based resin used in the biocomposite, as well as the biocomposite itself. We compare the life cycle impacts of the proposed biocomposite to a functionally similar petroleum-based resin and flax fiber reinforced composite, to identify tradeoffs between the environmental performance of the two products. We demonstrate that the bio-based resin (epoxidized sucrose soyate) compared to a conventional (bisphenol A-based) resin shows lower negative environmental impacts in most studied categories. When comparing the biocomposite to the fossil fuel derived composite, it is demonstrated that using epoxidized sucrose soyate versus a bisphenol A (BPA)-based epoxy resin can improve the environmental performance of the composite in most categories except eutrophication and ozone layer depletion. For future designs, considering an alternative cross-linker to facilitate the bond between the bio-based resin and the flax fiber, may help improve the overall environmental performance of the biocomposite. An uncertainty analysis was also performed to evaluate the effect of variation in LCA model inputs on the environmental results for both the biocomposite and composite. The findings show a better overall carbon footprint for the biocomposite compared to the BPA-based composite at almost all times, demonstrating a good potential for marketability especially in the presence of incentives or regulations that address reducing the carbon intensity of products. This analysis allowed us to pinpoint hotspots in the biocomposite's supply chain and recommend future modifications to improve the product's sustainability.

Indexed as

EnvironmentEpoxy ResinsSucroseEpoxy ResinsSucrosebiocompositeepoxidized sucrose soyate (ESS), life cycle assessmentsoybean-based resin

Identifiers

PMID32560446
PMCPMC7356212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.