Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32560256›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Gait Event Detection for Stroke Patients during Robot-Assisted Gait Training.

Andreas Schicketmueller, Juliane Lamprecht, Marc Hofmann, Michael Sailer, Georg Rose

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Effects of Timed Frontal Plane Pelvic Moments During Overground Walking With a Mobile TPAD System.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas SchicketmuellerHASOMED GmbH, Paul-Ecke-Str. 1, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8118-7281
Juliane LamprechtMEDIAN Neurological Rehabilitation Center Magdeburg, Gustav-Ricker-Str. 4, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2758-6334
Marc HofmannHASOMED GmbH, Paul-Ecke-Str. 1, 39114 Magdeburg, Germany.
Michael SailerMEDIAN Neurological Rehabilitation Center Magdeburg, Gustav-Ricker-Str. 4, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany.
Georg RoseInstitute for Medical Engineering and Research Campus STIMULATE, University of Magdeburg, Universitaetsplatz 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2215-150X
Hasomed (Germany) · DEOtto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 721577
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional electrical stimulation and robot-assisted gait training are techniques which are used in a clinical routine to enhance the rehabilitation process of stroke patients. By combining these technologies, therapy effects could be further improved and the rehabilitation process can be supported. In order to combine these technologies, a novel algorithm was developed, which aims to extract gait events based on movement data recorded with inertial measurement units. In perspective, the extracted gait events can be used to trigger functional electrical stimulation during robot-assisted gait training. This approach offers the possibility of equipping a broad range of potential robot-assisted gait trainers with functional electrical stimulation. In particular, the aim of this study was to test the robustness of the previously developed algorithm in a clinical setting with patients who suffered a stroke. A total amount of N = 10 stroke patients participated in the study, with written consent. The patients were assigned to two different robot-assisted gait trainers (Lyra and Lokomat) according to their performance level, resulting in five recording sessions for each gait-trainer. A previously developed algorithm was applied and further optimized in order to extract the gait events. A mean detection rate across all patients of 95.8% ± 7.5% for the Lyra and 98.7% ± 2.6% for the Lokomat was achieved. The mean type 1 error across all patients was 1.0% ± 2.0% for the Lyra and 0.9% ± 2.3% for the Lokomat. As a result, the developed algorithm was robust against patient specific movements, and provided promising results for the further development of a technique that can detect gait events during robot-assisted gait training, with the future aim to trigger functional electrical stimulation.

Indexed as

Gait AnalysisGait Disorders, NeurologicRoboticsStrokeStroke RehabilitationExercise TherapyHumansTreatment OutcomeWalkingfunctional electrical stimulation (FES)gait event detectionhybrid robotic rehabilitation systeminertial measurement unit (IMU)stroke

Identifiers

PMID32560256
PMCPMC7349052
OpenAlexW3034881639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.