ArticleLaryngo- rhino- otologie2020
[Central auditory processing in adolescents with communication impairments].
Article in Laryngo- rhino- otologie, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Germany, there are specialized vocational training units (BBW) for adolescents and young adults with special needs. The BBW Leipzig for people with disorders in hearing, language and communication registers a rising number of adolescents with auditory processing disorder (APD). However, test material to diagnose APD at this age is sparse. This study investigates auditory processing in adolescents with normal hearing but communication impairment with the available test material. MATERIALS AND
methods35 normal hearing adolescents (26 male, 9 female, mean age: 18.1 years) were included. All were trained at BBW Leipzig. Dichotic listening, understanding of speech in noise, accelerated speech, differentiation and analysis of phonemes were examined. In addition, non-verbal general intelligence, concentration, figural retentivity, and linguistic abilities were assessed.
results25 participants showed conspicious results concerning APD; 5 had never been diagnosed with APD so far. In 9/25 adolescents, there was no hint of top-down disorders. These participants had problems in accessing auditory information and holding and manipulating information in working memory, although both linguistic and intellectual abilities were normal or even above average.
conclusionsThe study has shown that adolescents can be conspicuous according to the APD criteria of the DGPP and that an APD diagnosis from childhood is not necessarily already present. It also became clear that multi-professional diagnostics remains important beyond childhood. Standardized tests with corresponding age norms are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.