Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32559803›Full record

ReviewRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2020

Primary Dysmenorrhea: Assessment and Treatment.

Inês Guimarães, Ana Margarida Póvoa

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 88 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05771753 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Core Stabilization and Dynamic Stretching Exercises on Symptoms Severity and Quality of Life in Primary Dysmenorrhea

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled32ConditionsPrimary DysmenorrheaArmsStretching Exercises, Dynamic core stabilizing exercises
NCT06227676 phase2 / phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Formative Assessment of the Effect of 'Cramp Bites' Intake on Primary Dysmenorrhea in Women Aged 18-25: A Placebo-Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCornell UniversityRan2022 to 2022Enrolled12ConditionsDysmenorrhea Primary, Dysmenorrhea, Menstrual Discomfort, Menstrual ProblemArmsCramp Bites by Aunt Flo's Kitchen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacological insights intoFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Dysmenorrhea and psychological distress: a meta-analysis.Archives of women's mental health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Exploring the Nutraceutical Potential ofFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Comparison of Substances in Combined Oral Contraceptives Used in Acne Vulgaris, Hirsutism, Migraine, and Dysmenorrhea.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inês GuimarãesFaculty of Medicine, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-6907-3679
Ana Margarida PóvoaFaculty of Medicine, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0018-9264
Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary dysmenorrhea is defined as menstrual pain in the absence of pelvic disease. It is characterized by overproduction of prostaglandins by the endometrium, causing uterine hypercontractility that results in uterine muscle ischemia, hypoxia, and, subsequently, pain. It is the most common gynecological illness in women in their reproductive years and one of the most frequent causes of pelvic pain; however, it is underdiagnosed, undertreated, and even undervalued by women themselves, who accept it as part of the menstrual cycle. It has major implications for quality of life, such as limitation of daily activities and psychological stress, being one of the main causes of school and work absenteeism. Its diagnosis is essentially clinical, based on the clinical history and normal physical examination. It is important to exclude secondary causes of dysmenorrhea. The treatment may have different approaches (pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical), but the first line of treatment is the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and, in cases of women who want contraception, the use of hormonal contraceptives. Alternative treatments, such as topical heat, lifestyle modification, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, dietary supplements, acupuncture, and acupressure, may be an option in cases of conventional treatments' contraindication. Surgical treatment is only indicated in rare cases of women with severe dysmenorrhea refractory to treatment.

Indexed as

DysmenorrheaQuality of LifeAdultAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalFemaleHumansLife StylePelvic PainAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal

Identifiers

PMID32559803
PMCPMC10309238
OpenAlexW3036880367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.