ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Moving analytical ultracentrifugation software to a good manufacturing practices (GMP) environment.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analytical Ultracentrifugation for Biopharmaceutical Characterization and Quality Control.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- BASIS: BioAnalysis SEDFIT integrated software for cGMP analysis of SV-AUC data.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2024Article
- An automated interface for sedimentation velocity analysis in SEDFIT.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Characterization and quantification of adeno-associated virus capsid-loading states by multi-wavelength analytical ultracentrifugation with UltraScan.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2023Article
- Suitability of double-stranded DNA as a molecular standard for the validation of analytical ultracentrifugation instruments.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2023Article
- Optimizing high-throughput viral vector characterization with density gradient equilibrium analytical ultracentrifugation.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2023Article
- Comparison of three AUC techniques for the determination of the loading status and capsid titer of AAVs.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2023Article
- AAV analysis by sedimentation velocity analytical ultracentrifugation: beyond empty and full capsids.European biophysics journal : EBJ · 2023Article
- An automated interface for sedimentation velocity analysis in SEDFIT.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- DNA supercoiling-induced shapes alter minicircle hydrodynamic properties.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- DNA supercoiling-induced shapes alter minicircle hydrodynamic properties.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- ACUVRA: Anion-Exchange Chromatography UV-Ratio Analysis-A QC-Friendly Method for Monitoring Adeno-Associated Virus Empty Capsid Content To Support Process Development and GMP Release Testing.The AAPS journal · 2022Article
- Multi-wavelength analytical ultracentrifugation of biopolymer mixtures and interactions.Analytical biochemistry · 2022Review
- Best Practices for Aggregate Quantitation of Antibody Therapeutics by Sedimentation Velocity Analytical Ultracentrifugation.Journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2022Review
- Analytical band centrifugation for the separation and quantification of empty and full AAV particles.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021Article
- Anion-exchange HPLC assay for separation and quantification of empty and full capsids in multiple adeno-associated virus serotypes.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021Article
- Assessment of the DNA partial specific volume and hydration layer properties from CHARMM Drude polarizable and additive MD simulations.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in instrumentation have moved analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) closer to a possible validation in a Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) environment. In order for AUC to be validated for a GMP environment, stringent requirements need to be satisfied; analysis procedures must be evaluated for consistency and reproducibility, and GMP capable data acquisition software needs to be developed and validated. These requirements extend to multiple regulatory aspects, covering documentation of instrument hardware functionality, data handling and software for data acquisition and data analysis, process control, audit trails and automation. Here we review the requirements for GMP validation of data acquisition software and illustrate software solutions based on UltraScan that address these requirements as far as they relate to the operation and data handling in conjunction with the latest analytical ultracentrifuge, the Optima AUC by Beckman Coulter. The software targets the needs of regulatory agencies, where AUC plays a critical role in the solution-based characterization of biopolymers and macromolecular assemblies. Biopharmaceutical and regulatory agencies rely heavily on this technique for characterizations of pharmaceutical formulations, biosimilars, injectables, nanoparticles, and other soluble therapeutics. Because of its resolving power, AUC is a favorite application, despite the current lack of GMP validation. We believe that recent advances in standards, hardware, and software presented in this work manage to bridge this gap and allow AUC to be routinely used in a GMP environment. AUC has great potential to provide more detailed information, at higher resolution, and with greater confidence than other analytical techniques, and our software satisfies an urgent need for AUC operation in the GMP environment. The software, including documentation, are publicly available for free download from Github. The multi-platform software is licensed by the LGPL v.3 open source license and supports Windows, Mac and Linux platforms. Installation instructions and a mailing list are available from ultrascan.aucsolutions.com.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.