Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32559185›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Effects of chronic treatment with new strains of Lactobacillus plantarum on cognitive, anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors in male mice.

Thaísa Barros-Santos, Kallyane Santos Oliveira Silva, Matheus Libarino-Santos, Elisangela Gouveia Cata-Preta, Henrique Sousa Reis, Eduardo Koji Tamura, Alexandre Justo de Oliveira-Lima, Laís Fernanda Berro, Ana Paula Trovatti Uetanabaro, Eduardo Ary Villela Marinho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Thaísa Barros-SantosDepartment of Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil.
Kallyane Santos Oliveira SilvaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil.
Matheus Libarino-SantosDepartment of Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil.
Elisangela Gouveia Cata-PretaDepartment of Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil.
Henrique Sousa ReisDepartment of Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil.
Eduardo Koji TamuraDepartment of Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil.
Alexandre Justo de Oliveira-LimaDepartment of Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil.
Laís Fernanda BerroDepartment of Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-4841-4117
Ana Paula Trovatti UetanabaroDepartment of Biological Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3992-8474
Eduardo Ary Villela MarinhoDepartment of Health Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz, Ilhéus, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz · BRUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychobiotics correspond to a class of probiotics, mainly of the genus Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, capable of producing neuroactive substances, such as γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and serotonin, which exert effects on the brain-gut axis. Evidence suggests that psychobiotics can have a beneficial effect on mood, anxiety and cognition. The present study evaluated the effects of chronic administration of two new strains of Lactobacillus plantarum, L. plantarum 286 (Lp 286) and L. plantarum 81 (Lp 81) isolated from the fermentation of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) and cupuaçu (Theobroma grandiflorum), respectively, on cognitive, anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors in male Swiss mice. Different groups of animals were administered (oral gavage) solutions of vehicle (0.85% saline plus 15% skim milk), Lp 286 (109/0.1 ml CFU) or Lp 81 (109/0.1 ml CFU) for 30 days, and animals were tested for general locomotor activity, depressive-like behavior in the forced swim test, and learning/memory and anxiety-like behavior in the plus-maze discriminative avoidance task. Treatment with the strains Lp 286 and Lp 81 did not interfere with locomotor activity or learning and memory. The Lp 286 strain exerted anti-depressant- and anxiolytic-like effects under our experimental conditions. Our findings add to the current body of evidence suggesting that probiotics from the genus Lactobacillus may exert psychobiotic potential and introduce a new strain, Lp 286, as a potential candidate in the prevention or as therapeutic adjuvant in the treatment of mental disorders.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCognitionAnimalsAnxietyDepressionLactiplantibacillus plantarumLocomotionMaleMaze LearningMice

Identifiers

PMID32559185
PMCPMC7304620
OpenAlexW3036205598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.